The US can designate non profit aid as terrorists but Canada can’t revoke the citizenship of a political terrorist? US is playing by different rules now. Are Canadian politicians going to be as spineless as US Liberals. Doesn’t sound like a winning strategy.

There are no more shortages. Companies just raised their stock prices.

Its bad on TikTok too. I’ve seen lots of news clips on TikTok of Trump and the 51st sate comment. Most comment replies to these videos have been from Maga supporters. Along the lines of “Canada should be honored to become part of the greatest country on earth”.

It’s very disturbing and very serious. An outright sign of war. It’s a tarrif war for now but I worry about what it will be in future.

I don’t really understand the carbon tax debate. Carbon tax would reduce carbon emissions and cause mild inflation. However corporate greed causes mass inflation and provides no benefit. Why aren’t people more mad at greedflation?

I use cachyos for gaming and work. It’s amazing. Stable, fast, drivers all work with no extra setup. Just select Ext4 during installation if you want the fastest hard drive performance.

Make a dual boot system. You can continue to use win10 while getting comfortable with linux. If something breaks just reboot.

https://youtu.be/2CyKgFUm6W4

Japan figured it out.

I’d also add that Poliviere has been dwarfed by the magnitude of issues.

When things were only slightly bad post covid, people still had the capacity to worry about things like how many genders there are.

Then things got existential level bad after Trump came in. Things got very serious. A lot of Poliviere’s even recent complaints felt inconsequential while our sovereignty is under attack.

He is not Trump in diguise. He is the conservative equivalent of J Singh. Both these leaders have no actual policy and just knee jerk support whatever is popular in the moment. When Trump was popular he supported trumpism, now that it’s no longer popular he changed his tune. He’ll change his stance every day.

What politician is going to anger the majority of their voters, and anger the lobbyists making them rich, to instead do the right thing and ensure poor people get housed?

If you owned a house worth $2Mn would you be OK with its value dropping to $800k if it meant all poor people in your city got a tiny house or condo? Additionally most people are Nimbys, so even the location of new housing is controversial.

The majority of the population either has a paid off home or is on a mortgage. No politician is going to alienate that voter base by building more housing. No matter how much it affects homeless people or the next generation of young adults.