That’s reductionist. There’s no reason a Chinese spy can’t also be a gamer.

Kind of reductionist but ok

Sweet, easy money.

Won’t scale? Where’s your imagination! I’ll hire people.

And, I’m not smart, and I don’t have any unique skills. On the contrary I have several mental issues and a low IQ. If I can do it, 60% of the population can.

All they lack is determination.

::checks stocks

Not affecting me, I’m all in on Coke and Railways.

Oh, so like a RRSP kind of, but better.

Love this. Stolen.

I mean, illegal or legal depends on who writes the rules…

Nobody paying attention thinks they’ll go bankrupt. Just that demand for inference and training will subside, so those chips will find their way back into the use case from which they came.

I’m general Gamers, which lemmy has a lot of, have an interesting relationship with technology. They kind of know how it works and what it can do, but they significantly overestimate their superficial understanding.

This is only true if you want it to be.

I’ve built mobos, I’ve added RAM to devices without expansion slots, and I’ve recovered data from smashed cellphones by extracting the flash memory. I’ve used GPUs with broken DVI/HDMI/VGA by passing the framebuffer over a <1ms 10 gbps link.

It’s doable. If I can get a b200 you better believe I’ll find a way to use it.

OpenAI is the one holding the chipworld hostage. They need to fall to realize your dream.

Fundamentals hardly mattered after 1933, then not at all after 1971.

Yeah, I don’t think they build things, I didn’t think they “do tasks”. I literally think they’re transformer based next word predictors.

Still sounds optimistic to me. I also don’t think that level of reduction is useful, but I’m pretty pedantic.

I read your post twice. I still think you’re overestimating them. Maybe I’m underestimating, but you haven’t convinced me if that.

Oh wow, you’re very optimistic. Congratulations I guess.

I think you’re really overestimating these LLMs.

All it is, is a next word predictor. It’s not intelligent and it doesn’t make decisions. It’s only as good as the engine you’re driving it.

Nah, you overestimate these tools.

Hard disagree. LLMs I simply next word predictors that’s all they really do. It’s the human driving them that makes the decisions.

LLMs don’t “build” they simply do what they’re told. So they’re only as good as the engineer using them.

I think you’re highly overrating them.

So more of a developer then?

My take away is some distros had patches much quicker than others. Debian smelling good these days.