Sounds about right.

It may inflate the numbers for now, but overall I think it’s just going to have a negative impact. I may have decided to play with it at somepoint, I’m just somewhere between disinterested and distrusting of the tech. Now that it’s been shoved down my throat though, I adamantly REFUSE to touch Gemini. Installing it on my devices and giving it all my data without consent is absurd overreach and should be a felony.

Gotta support local businesses y’know?

‘Psst, need some eggs? I know a guy…’

I mean; their latest line of cards is plagued with problems, not the least of which is the cards being shipped with less available cores than advertised and different amounts than each other (same card model, different stats, bit of a dice roll as to which you’ll get).

So I’m sure the tariffs are having a bad effect too; but a significant amount of their loss is their own doing.

Tobacco is a hardier plant that can be grown in more places than coca AFAIK.

Now you can support your community with locally grown and cultivated cocaine, instead of relying on imports. Lmao

There’s a lot of things he’s not supposed to be able to do.

Until America actually does anything about it; he’s got free rein to do whatever the hell he wants.

Certainly; the hard part is getting high quality captures from high quality sources.

Some people are happy to watch CAM-rips, others won’t settle for less than full quality blu-rays.

On your update:

Ah, Linux. Forgot about that variable. Interesting to see you didn’t have to mess with it much, that used to be a hassle though doable.

Linux gives you a bit more freedom to get around these blocks; so to counter this Netflix and many other streaming providers limit the resolution and bitrate available to Linux clients. Often they won’t serve better than 720p to any linix client if I remember right, even with you paying the premium for 4k content.

Some people may be fine with that, others not so much. Louis Rossman made quite a fuss about that a while back.

I’m not on desktop.

Besides; It’s a download button, it shouldn’t be opening in a new tab to begin with. It should perform the action the button is labeled with and actually download the file.

It’s just missing an http header: ‘content-disposition: attachment’

It doesn’t show as an image. Long-pressing on it tries to select random text on the page regardless of where you press.

https://cdn.rexum.space/usenet/Usenet Providers and Backbones (Version 2025-02-23).svg

Will not save in any way.

There’s TONS of that available…

TPB, YourBittorrent, Limetorrents, Badasstorrents.

Those are just the free torrent trackers I use as backups that all return results for that show.

I’m sure you can find more. Take a look at the pile of free trackers available in prowlarr or jackett.

There’s even more on Usenet (my primary source).

I wanted to keep a copy, but the download button basically doesn’t work.

Instead of downloading, it opens in a new tab.

Chrome provides 0 options to download or save the page. There is no print option, and ‘share’ saves the page url as a text file.

Firefox provides a print option, but it saves as a pdf that’s so horribly compressed that the text is like 3 pixels tall and entirely unreadable.

DuckDuckGo provides a print option in full resolution, but it cuts off everything to the right of the letter ‘s’ in ‘usenet tree’, saving only a narrow slice of the page.

You might have more luck with an AMD card, but Nvidia works closely with these DRM companies. It’s baked into the graphics drivers that you can only get from Nvidia. Doesn’t matter what recording software you use, they ALL have to go through the graphics drivers which will not release the video stream to them.

Without cracked drivers; you’re SOL going down that route.

DRM prevents that. Your graphics drivers will refuse to release the video info to the screen capture software leaving you with an empty black rectangle in the video. Otherwise a lot more people would do this.

You might be able to use either a capture card to grab the actual video signal being output by the machine; or a VM with the capture software running outside it on the host. I’ve never tried the latter, but I’m told it works.

While I haven’t tried this myself; I’ve been told streaming to a web browser that’s running in a VM will let you screen record the VM from the host machine.

If you try to just screen record the browser directly with screen cap software; the DRM + graphics drivers will prevent the recording from seeing the video, it’ll just show as an empty black rectangle. Supposedly this doesn’t work against a VM displayed to its host though.

“Ooo, I know! We’ll distract them with an actual rapist while we rape their government behind their backs, and loot the National Treasury” - Trump Admin

You’re smoke screen is less than convincing.

Napalm is easy to make. Molotov that shit.

https://archive.ph/20250225180133/https://www.ft.com/content/2dfa3c11-64a7-49f6-83df-939b8d1cfb8e

Bear saber; the latest starwars backwoods hunting game.

You can redirect regular DNS like that, but DoH/DoT is encrypted using certificates with a chain of trust just like any other tls connection (that’s kind of the whole point). It would throw security errors breaking dns resolution if you redirected the connection to your own server.

You would still be better off with a vpn wrapping the connection however as the SNI in each https connection is unencrypted and can be used to log your traffic.