data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1dc29/1dc29b014ffb7e7b875cbdd34f106afc3bd6c55c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd44e/fd44e48b8c9b4917cd7604000c4eb9b847c403d7" alt=""
That’s not a bit hyperbolic, it’s a full blown straw man argument.
There is nothing inherently expensive in a good grinder, not from an engineering, manufacturing or materials perspective. Sure small volume manufacturing is more expensive, but we’re still talking brands making thousands of units and not small one-off productions, so it’s not that much more expensive.
I want a good grinder, and I also want to pay for quality. They simply charge more for the equipment than I believe is reasonable, because the amount of work and cost required to produce the product is fairly low.
You can do R&D, but you can make absolutely terrific grinders without it. Most of the “innovation” happening in this space seems to be more novelty than actual noticable performance/quality gains for the end user.