• 1 Post
  • 17 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: September 14th, 2025

help-circle

  • National liberation, national renaissance, the restoration of nationhood to the people, commonwealth: whatever may be the headings used or the new formulas introduced, decolonization is always a violent phenomenon.

    …

    Decolonization is the veritable creation of new men. But this creation owes nothing of its legitimacy to any supernatural power; the “thing” which has been colonized becomes man during the same process by which it frees itself.

    In decolonization, there is therefore the need of a complete calling in question of the colonial situation. If we wish to describe it precisely, we might find it in the wellknown words: “The last shall be first and the first last.” Decolonization is the putting into practice of this sentence. That is why, if we try to describe it, all decolonization is successful.

    The naked truth of decolonization evokes for us the searing bullets and bloodstained knives which emanate from it. For if the last shall be first, this will only come to pass after a murderous and decisive struggle between the two protagonists. That affirmed intention to place the last at the head of things, and to make them climb at a pace (too quickly, some say) the well-known steps which characterize an organized society, can only triumph if we use all means to turn the scale, including, of course, that of violence.

    You do not turn any society, however primitive it may be, upside down with such a program if you have not decided from the very beginning, that is to say from the actual formulation of that program, to overcome all the obstacles that you will come across in so doing. The native who decides to put the program into practice, and to become its moving force, is ready for violence at all times. From birth it is clear to him that this narrow world, strewn with prohibitions, can only be called in question by absolute violence.

    ~ Frantz Fanon, The Wretched of the Earth

    Your point, that the oppressed should stay subservient and exploited because the struggle for liberation will bring about violence from the oppressor, ignores the generations of violence done onto the vast majority of the world and the violence that continues to weigh upon and threatens to crush everyone under this capitalist-imperialist hellscape. You should fight because of that violence.



  • The image is called, Strengthen attack dynamics, resolutely wipe out pornography, gambling and drugs It’s a propaganda poster published in the People’s Republic of China in 1997 and is from a series of propaganda called Talk about civilization and create a new style propaganda posters.

    I was just searching through Chineseposter.net and came across this and thought it was interesting. For me, I feel that this poster, as well as the others in the series serve as a primer to think about the ways societies with differing histories, economic modes of production, and global relations may view crime, social issues, or even what is considered impolite in public spaces (see the no spitting poster in the series). I think it’s cool to look through the site and see how the art style of posters changed over time. This series is distinct from the more modern posters and of course are different from those made in the cultural revolution, not just in style but content.






  • I finally put down Between Two Fires. After reflecting on my critiques of the book I gave in last week’s book discussion thread, I decided to not finish it. But thankfully some of my comrades really wanted to read The Wretched of the Earth, so we’ve been reading that and, as expected, it’s amazing. I just listened to the On Violence section twice on audiobook and plan to go back and read through the PDF copy I have. I know Rev Left has a Red Menace episode covering the work but if anyone has any study guides or resources for Wretched of the Earth that my group and I could use, please send them my way!

    In addition to WotE, my on again off again book is still Dialectics of Chinese Labor: Trade Unions Under Market Socialism by Immanuel Ness. I’m going to leave the summary and link to a free copy in this message below because I really do recommend this book (though i haven’t finished it yet). Like I said last week, the book is kind of repetitive in the way that it sets up each chapter but other than that I think it’s a good read.

    Summary

    A Marxist sociology of state owned enterprises (SOEs), trade unions, and workers in China’s gig and platform economy — from Mao Zedong to Xi Jinping. This book challenges the myth of the “passive worker” and argues that, against the grain, the labour movement is working.

    It’s a book that rightfully criticizes western labor organizing and unions, but its main thesis is to challenge the western narratives made against the All-China Federation of Trade Unions. It talks about how Chinese workers have organized and adapted to reform and opening up, rural to urban migration, and the rise of the digital platform economy. It also discusses the relationship between the union and the CPC which is cool to hear explained as a transmission belt between the party and the workers.

    The PDF is free on the authors website, linked below. https://labourdialectics.org/







  • I’ve been reading two books.

    I’ve been doing a lot of painting at work the last two weeks which has given me the opportunity to listen to an audiobook recording of ‘Between Two Fires.’ It’s a grim dark fantasy that takes place in the 1300s during the plague and the apocalypse from the christian bible. The story follows an excommunicated knight, an alcoholic gay priest, and a little girl. It’s got its good parts, and I’ve enjoyed a good chunk of it, but I don’t think I can recommend this book, and I’ll explain why in the spoiler.

    [CW for talk of SA] Critique of Between Two Fires

    spoiler

    The book opens up with an attempt of rape against a child and throughout the book the author repeatedly uses rape and pedophilia as a narrative tool to heighten the stakes of a given situation. I think that this is such a shitty trope to use in literature, and I know my opinion would be hand waved away by some reddit chuds who’d say something like, “the medieval times were brutal bro, the author is just being realistic.” But you know what, the author is the one writing the story and has complete control over the world and the narrative and gets to choose what happens. I think that the use of rape as a narrative tool, used to garner support from the reader for a character is lazy and at best is an example of writing that is tasteless and comes with the risk of alienating and traumatizing your audience for no reason. Also, something that was just disgusting is the author compares one of the main character’s attempt of pedophilic rape to the plucking of a divine fruit… just gross.

    Another thing is that there’s not a single woman character that has any internality throughout the book. I haven’t finished yet, I’m around chapter 22 I think, and so far, the book is just about the thoughts and deeds of men. There are women in the book but they only exist as set dressing or sexual objects used by characters. The only possible exception is of the child, but her actions or thoughts are always to provide an example of a Catholic portrayal of innocence that’s also always a response to the actions of men.

    The book is, “what if Christianity was real?” So of course, homophobia isn’t just portrayed as a thing of its time (homophobia was never okay) but instead being queer is treated as a universal morally reprehensible thing justified by literal angels and devils existing in the book’s universe. This critique also extends to racism against Arab and Turkish people and anti-religiousness against Muslims and Jewish people. I haven’t finished the book yet, maybe these things are touched on more but how the author has handled SA and writing women, I’m not going to hold my breath.

    I’m sure there’s other things that I’ve missed.

    The second book I’ve been reading is Theory related, Yay! It’s called, “Dialectics of Chinese Labor: Trade Unions Under Market Socialism” by Immanuel Ness.

    The summary on the website is,

    A Marxist sociology of state owned enterprises (SOEs), trade unions, and workers in China’s gig and platform economy — from Mao Zedong to Xi Jinping. This book challenges the myth of the “passive worker” and argues that, against the grain, the labour movement is working.

    It’s a book that rightfully criticizes western labor organizing and unions, but its main thesis is to challenge the western narratives made against the All-China Federation of Trade Unions. It talks about how Chinese workers have organized and adapted to reform and opening up, rural to urban migration, and the rise of the digital platform economy. It also discusses the relationship between the union and the CPC which is cool to hear explained as a transmission belt between the party and the workers.

    The book is quite repetitive, but I fully recommend it. The PDF is free on the authors website, linked below. https://labourdialectics.org/


  • I feel that it’s almost a certainty that the US and other imperialist states are infiltrating and trying to steer all of the protests to whatever ends are most advantageous to them, or the least harmful.

    It seems that the US state department is funding the electoral arm of the student movement in Albania right now through several different organizations/NGOs. I happened to listen to a Madleton Pendleton video the other day where they went through the donor list of the student movement’s public facing org. While the information is coming from a youtuber and that means it’s not a certainty, I feel that it’s safe to assume the imperialists have their hands in as many pots as they can reach and student movements, with their lack of discipline and no ideological or party line, are easy to reach pots. We saw the color revolution in Nepal and how that ended.

    Of course I’m not disparaging the protesters in Albania, France or anywhere. Their struggles are righteous and born from serious and real hardships. I hope for nothing but the best for them, genuinely, but the ruling class doesn’t need to start the fight, they just care about how it ends and they have most of the pieces on the board.