The older “Dog in the hunt” is a bit less grim.

Unless you’re a fox…

are you implying firefox is in a state of neglect?

hence the word “seek”

you can link external images like so

![](www.image.url)

?

Yeah that’s fucking bullshit. Mcdonalds isn’t very cheap at all.

UwUntu

uh, why not?

funny how technically the marlboros are the most natural thing of these

On the contrary. They can hide this kind of thing in the numbers. Reporting on egregious individual cases has a chance to heighten awareness.

On a positive note, that kind of claim has been struck down in Canada before.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/marisagarcia/2024/02/19/what-air-canada-lost-in-remarkable-lying-ai-chatbot-case/

Nah, a democratic nation has to follow its own laws. It looks much better if they revoke it with proof after due process.

did they expect any different? Why would anyone on Greenland be aligned with someone who threatened to invade you?

A few friends of mine used to have a sms-based group chat we used for many years. One of those friends kept losing phones and getting new numbers. At some point one of his older numbers texted something to the tune of “what the fuck is this, why are you texting me?!”. It turns out the old number had been reassigned.

then again, no state secrets were exchanged.

What’s the point of a summary that’s longer than the article itself?

that is not the image you showed.

they’re a type of eagle candy.

looks fine to me, the problem is on your end, or it’s intermittent somehow.

Me neither. I would have thought this was exactly the kind of situation impeachment was meant to stop. I am thoroughly confused.