Someone said Rust wasn’t very good at UIs in terms of performance. Though I don’t remember where it was published.

I do agree with you. Safety is important nowadays. Though if there’s a use case where Rust gets a very noticeable performance disadvantage (like UI), it may be better to just use C.

Well performance is important and Rust is fast on paper afaik but idk how it works in real use cases. I don’t remember seeing performance benefits on Rust compared to other languages that are not C.

That’s the issue. You liberals consider everything else hate. Also having to create another instance is segregation which is considered terrible by all of you.

That’s still a problem. It really doesn’t make the community look good. I think that also creates an issue similar to Big Tech networks where you don’t get opinions from all sides of arguments (unless you have many accounts on many instances).

I wish the Fediverse didn’t ban users for legal political opinions.

The line will be like several quadrillion characters long though.

Common sense. Just making the same code into a single line won’t change much.

That’s cheating. It won’t actually make the code smaller.

An issue for sure. Larger code is never good.

I won’t. They’re all just KDE shills with gigabytes of Plasma crash reports in the respective directories anyways. /s

That is a level of wisdom I don’t even hope to achieve.

GNOME is the best DE.

Asahi is not suitable for daily driver yet afaik. But Framework is a good one.

Yet we still ban developers for political reasons…

Isn’t Snapdragon 8 Elite a mobile CPU SoC? Afaik they rarely get support in the kernel. I only know one other chip that has it and it’s the 845. Well now I guess we can hope a phone with the 8 Elite can get a custom ROM easier.

Wait I thought it’s an industry standard component used in the Linux space like systemd or something.

Unlike almost all other software products, Linux really is getting faster.

Will a report answer it? Asking for a friend.

Then my answer is yes.