The part you’re not talking about is that there’s no catalytic converters on rockets tough, so it’s more like running a carbureted car than a modern car.

In many locations it’s the difference between having Internet and not having it at all. The only issue with it is it being privately owned.

“anti elite”

Big quotation marks on that

We could call it the Gulf of Cuba to troll the Republicans

Last time that much fresh water got dumped in the Atlantic ocean (when the glacier over north america melted) it resulted in an ice age over Europe… So… Good luck guys 👍

For the second time… At the order of the same person…

At least States can set their own goals…

Didn’t know it was mandatory for me to travel to Punta Cana twice a year, I haven’t done my mandatory air travel in… 33 years! Oh shit! What about the majority of the world’s population that never took a plane, what are they gonna do? 😱

Thing is these corporations don’t emit in a vacuum, they emit to fill demand for their products, demand that comes from people.

If people stop traveling all over the world and ordering shit to be delivered the next day they won’t keep the planes flying for no reason, but that’s something that’s 100% in regular people’s hands. Boeing can use more efficient engines, it’s still not sustainable to use them, but they won’t stop using them if there’s demand.

Not if it can’t run games that people want to play.

Then Linux shouldn’t be suggested as a replacement for Windows for gamers.

Lucky you, not my experience at all, even ended up repurchasing a game on Steam while it was on sale because at some point, time is money and I had spent a whole lot of money trying to make it work.

That’s a load of bullshit, how is money going to a pension fund making the people richer when no money was withdrawn from it until 2016 even though it has existed since 1990?

They have a flat taxation rate of 22% with sales taxes at 25%. Compare that to the US with billionaires paying no taxes at all…

1000$ PC? No shit you need to play 2D indie games!

So toxic masculinity, not patriarchy.

Where do you draw the line? Where do you stop blaming patriarchy and start blaming the people who have a fucked up sense of right vs wrong?

A man that screams at his wife when he’s angry, that’s patriarchy or that’s on them?

A man that quietly belittles his wife?

A woman that does these things to her husband?

If there’s physical violence I’m sure you won’t repeat your previous message and say that they’re victims as well.

It’s not the result of patriarchy, is the result of them being bad people. They would still exist under a matriarchy or in an equal society.

No, patriarchy is men having power, it doesn’t define what they can or can’t do otherwise.

This has nothing to do with men being in position of power, this has everything to do with people having no empathy. If we lived in a matriarchy and people acted the same way they would still be assholes.

An asshole is an asshole is an asshole, don’t you dare act like it’s not these women’s fault if they have no compassion.

When there’s only one party leader with enough of a brain to lead the country but he represents a party that is only present in one province and he wants to break that country in two…