How is that edgy then? I would say it’s a valid question to ask the chatbot. With any chatbot it’s interesting to see what its limits are, and what sorts of questions it won’t answer.

Maybe there will be some small movements towards more co-operation with the EU, but probably not any big moves for at least the next few years.

The UK could even join the EU customs union without joining the single market or the EU itself, like Turkey has done, but yeah it’s probably unlikely for the moment. Labour don’t want to take a big political risk I guess.

Good points to be honest.

Yeah that makes sense. But on the other hand, jailing people for life costs money and there’s the slim chance they can escape. But I suppose if you have good security then a full life sentence would be an effective deterrent, so maybe you wouldn’t have to pay for very many people to have such long sentences, so it might not cost so much.

I’m not sure, but the UK’s National Health Service mentions depression as a potential side effect.

Drugs can have all sorts of side effects through mechanisms that we might not fully understand (maybe scientists do understand this particular mechanism though, I don’t know).

I guess I’m being downvoted due to just mentioning the death penalty. The only reason I asked is because callers on LBC (radio) were mentioning the death penalty so I wondered what people on Lemmy would think.

Do you guys on here think this is an acceptable sentence, or do you think Britain should have the death penalty for cases like this?

You’re probably right. Things like joining the customs union probably won’t happen until at least the next government in 2029.

Yeah I guess the invasion of Ukraine didn’t happen. It’s just a “propaganda” myth isn’t it.

The UK doesn’t need to necessarily jump straight back into EU membership. There are other ways we can work together with Europe. Maybe at some point the UK government will consider rejoining the EU customs union and/or single market.