There’s never been a way for a voter to know if their vote has been changed after they cast it.

Everything that pushes down voter turnout serves fascism. That’s just one example. People stayed home. Sure, it wasn’t a factor by itself, but that wasn’t the only factor, was it?

The fuck are you even talking about?

$5.6M. The larger amount is still held up, though it is in escrow. And he’s abused his office to grift way more than that, so it’s just chump change. Not to mention that it’ll be a lot hard for the UK to get him to pay up.

If that’s your issue, ask yourself whether the Palestinians will be better off if the US is fascist. Then vote accordingly.

Great. Will they vote like it, or be influenced by the gEnOcIdE jOe type shit again?

EA hasn’t been worth a shit since NHL '95 for Sega Genesis.

If anyone knows how to stall the legal process, it’s little t. “Eventually” means nothing.

So he’ll drop it, BBC will be awarded compensation, and he won’t pay it.

I’m in this picture and I don’t like it.

He drops the suit in three, two…

Where can I vote for you?

What the actual fuck is the point of non-voting shares apart from bailing out one massive douche?

noooo

Enforcement of your law would eliminate most of the crime. And really change the demographics of prison populations.

It’s much harder to get away with vote changing when there’s a paper trail. The greater concern is the closed source voting machines, where you have no idea what’s going on inside, whether there’s an internal paper that matches your receipt, where touchscreens can be miscalibrated and a bunch of people who don’t ask for or double check their receipt get fucked over, etc.

Edit: This might still be unclear. Some places have you casting your vote on a computer. Some places have you fill out a paper ballot and feed it into a counting machine. The second case, there’s no mystery program handling the voting, it’s still on paper.

If you’re putting a paper ballot into a machine, the machine is just counting. The paper ballots are retained for hand recounts if necessary. That’s different from casting your actual vote on a machine.

Maldong, indeed.

He’s posturing by saying “they’re all very good” in order to get the most people to pay him off.

LLMs only respond to inputs. They don’t have independent ideas. And their responses are just predictive of what the input intends a response to be.

Accurate prediction models can be extremely useful, but there’s a reason why weather prediction models aren’t considered intelligent. It’s because they aren’t designed to mimic human conversation.

They are playing us for absolute fools.