I looked this up to find a source because I’d never heard it. From what I can find, it’s one of a few unratified amendments, but this one was proposed in 1789. Sure would’ve been great if they’d have ratified something like this.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_Apportionment_Amendment

Did you also get the part about how people with stereotypical high fem gender expression who are often described as “ditzy” by a misogynistic society can be intelligent even though they like “girly” things?

That wanting to dress a certain way and naturally having a certain personality or way of speaking doesn’t define who you are or what you can do or how good at your job you are?

That in a male dominated field you should be able to express yourself even though the industry wants you to conform and “tone it down” and “not be so emotional” and also smile less but not too much less or else you’re “bitchy”? That diversity is good and helps bring in new ideas/perspectives?