data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b42e1/b42e13cd5d0b5e7c1bf1e57d4567efe012516d9b" alt=""
The article conflates liberal and progressive, but it really is talking about a progressive tea party.
The article conflates liberal and progressive, but it really is talking about a progressive tea party.
A bunch of them think the crisis is we haven’t done enough fascism yet.
Yeah, but that just makes him a much-better-than-average human.
Because academic institutions only award promotions to people who publish in certain journals. Disseminating knowledge is not the goal, because administrators/accrediting bodies are unable/unwilling to assess the value of intellectual contributions. They outsource this to journals which are expected to ensure that research is “legitimate”. I’d argue that they are very ineffective at this, but it still gives decision-makers an easy heuristic to use when they wanna see “number go up”.
Anticipating this as a “fabricate claims” ploy like in Crusader Kings. Gotta find that cassus belli.
Oh yeah, the Chinese government only wishes for mutual cooperation.
I guess we’ll see just how powerful branding really is.
What people are missing in the comments is that you can choose to play a bot match if that’s what you want. But you CAN’T sign up to play against people and guarantee that that’s what you’ll be doing. And they are not transparent about it.
Why retaliate with tariffs which only hurt Canadians and not strategically embargo certain good exports and eliminate US IP protections in the US?