• 0 Posts
  • 4 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: September 2nd, 2025

help-circle

  • Something to keep in mind, is that it is not open source.

    This is a distinction with embarrassingly little difference in this case. Such little difference it’s not worth mentioning in this way.

    Their definition of “not open source” is that you are required by the license to put a logo of the engine before the game starts. This is actually not too different from “a copy of this license must be included…“ which is in most open source licenses.

    The source is indeed open, the author just doesn’t know what that means.



  • Aarons’ reasoning for trusting ChatGPT, he said in the August hearing, was that he’d heard of doctors using AI for medical research.

    “So, Counsel, do you watch the news? Do you listen to the radio? Do you read anything about what’s going on in the world?” one of the judges asked Aarons. “Because the problem with lawyers relying on AI hallucinations is an above-the-fold story every single day.”

    …

    “So, either you buried your head in the sand. And that’s a choice to do that. An intentional choice to be uninformed,” the judge continued to Aarons. “Or, you took a gamble. And neither of those are consistent with the code of conduct. So I’m really struggling with your response, saying, ‘Well, I didn’t understand. I didn’t know about hallucinations.’ My 13-year-old nephew knows about hallucinations. My 75-year-old stepmother knows about hallucinations. So, either you made a decision not to be aware of what’s happening in the world in using this tool appropriately, which is a willful choice. Or you decided to roll the dice.”

    “So you didn’t say, ‘I relied on ChatGPT, and it submitted lies to the court, and the court is mad at me, and now there’s a hearing.’ I’m guessing you didn’t tell your client’s family members that,” a judge asked Aarons.

    “I didn’t talk about ChatGPT. I just said there was a problem with a brief that I filed,” Aarons said.