Don’t be afraid to drop a tool although you’ve spent years mastering it if there is something new that is much more efficient. Some day you have to switch anyway.

They added the attribution

https://github.com/avtakkar/peerd/commit/15aa104827b5552d48a7462eef6d040eca2ad582

https://github.com/Azure/peerd/issues/109

Why?

What is the benefit of fedora and its atomic version, if you use flatpak and distrobox on both installs? Add btrfs snapshots and you can’t brick your system either, which is your point, I guess

How can you tell that it’s a good shoe? I tried resesrching it but it’s wishy-washy

You’re right, that’s gone

I’m on your side but we shouldn’t mock op but support him.

Microsoft’s still has MIT license

Why would ffmpeg run faster on another distro?

Some people wear underwear with huge names on them. I don’t understand it. Good for you if it does not bother you.

I’m not liking the idea that my partner sees an ad every time we get intimate

Thanks for mentioning that. I have no idea how to judge a shoe’s quality. I have to do some research

That sounds like those youtubers

People run around with nike logos

And pay for it. People are walking ads

Yes, exploit protection is not responsible for osmands slowness. It could impact startup, but nothing more

It’s not related to graphene. I’ve seen osmamd being snaily on other flagships as well

Wdym with the hourly updates?

I don’t have that on anymore, it’s not really faster than before

But only on android … It’s blazingly fast on ios

Yes, graphene

Osmand isn’t cheap to buy and a lot of people pay for it. Where else do you think their money comes from?

Osmand is slow and too complex on my pixel 9, yet I still use it

That’s what I don’t understand. Usually you quote the original source. What if it was a video?

The twitter guy didnt share the link to the source