Jfc. enough.

Again, you’re victim to propaganda. The SU and GDR proclaimed stricter and swifter and better denazification, even built a anti-fascist-wall, but in reality they not only employed former NSDAP politicians, but even doctors who participated in euthanasia-programs of disabled children. They even helped them conceal their identity because it wouldn’t have the right look.

And the Soviet Union had its own nuclear program with their own Nazi scientists.

It was Realpolitik on both sides, stop ignoring one side’s faults because you like it more.

Well, therein lies your problem.

People have a right to exist, not nations.

is what you said.

I don’t decide people voted wrong, indeed. History looks at how elections were conducted, - and frankly, even common sense should point out - that people recently occupied by a foreign power usually do not get to vote freely and independently. Look at the annexation of Austria by Hitler. I think the Krim „referendum“ had only 95 or 97% approved instead of 99%, but you get the point.

Right, Ukraine is comparable to the Nazi Regime that had conquered large parts of Europe and declared war on the US, and Ukraine being younger than you somehow justifies a war against it. It seems you’ve eaten up so much Russian propaganda, your brain is fried.

America has never once supported democracy that wasn’t profitable to America’s oligarchs, and always at the expense of the workers everywhere.

D-Day was democratic

Make it make sense.

And - seriously - what is your obsession with this stupid graph? This is like the 5th time you posted this, as if you expected this commonly known information somehow explains geopolitics.

The people of the Donbass are also people. What’s your point? Once a nation or border is established its somehow undemocratic to change that?

Dude, I don’t even know what to say. If you cannot see that a foreign power invading isn’t democratic, we don’t have the necessary base of principles to talk.

People being tied to land is serfdom, feudalism. Land is tied to people.

That is a highschoolers take on this topic, come on.

And even it’s founding was undemocratic. The first Soviet Referendum saw almost unanimous consensus by all the Republics to stay in the USSR, INCLUDING UKRAINE.

That’s almost 40 years ago, what’s your point?

America has never once supported democracy that wasn’t profitable to America’s oligarchs, and always at the expense of the workers everywhere.

This is a non sequitur but at least we agree on that.

Doesn’t matter when the clause was introduced.

Russia has elections like North Korea has elections. Putin might be popular, but so is Trump.

Gorbachev dissolved the entire Soviet Union against the democratic mandate of the people.

Didn’t you say Nations don’t have a right to exist, anyway?

So it’s France now, not Europa anymore? Progress, I suppose.

I don’t know or care about the Eurovision Song Contest, but I do know that voting in Ukraine is halted during martial law, which was installed in case of a invasion by a foreign power - which makes sense. I’m on the line about this, actually, but I do love how you bring this up to critize it, but ignore Putins cling to power by manipulation and election fraud. You‘ll probably similarly defend the elections in the GDR, Soviet Union and North Korea.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_hybrid_warfare https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_sabotage_operations_in_Europe

Go ahead, read up on it.

Democracy is derived from the individual

Demos is literally people. A large group of people who form a nation have a right to uphold that nation. Logically, ethically, and judicially.

Why do you say „You seem to think China simply existing after all this is a threat“? How could you possible arrive at that conclusion?

And same with Russia, every war with Russia has always come from Europe attacking it. Now is no different. And the reason is obvious, same reason we always attack someone.

Nah, I consider Russia a threat for attacking other countries, conducting hybrid warfare against European countries and threatening nuclear attacks multiple times.

That weird statistic again, we haven’t attacked the US, Russia, Canada or Australia or China. Pick another hill.

France is also in the world, doesn’t mean everyone on the planet takes part in the CFA.

Polls consistently show most Ukrainians reject giving up territory for peace. And “annexation makes the debt disappear” means the people being annexed lose their say entirely.

Opposing neoliberalism and colonialism and opposing Russia’s invasion are not contradictory positions. I‘d argue you’re a hypocrite for wanting one colonial leftover gone, but another installed.

deleted by creator

Neither America nor Europe has the CFA-Franc-Zone. You are either thoroughly confused, blinded by hate, or a bot.

You keep posting this resource graph as if people are claiming this was a war for resources and this was proof it’s all wrong - neither is true. The war is about restoring power, glory and perceived claim to once/former territory, which is worse, imo.

I’m not defending colonialism or neoliberalism, btw.

Right, China is completely peaceful towards its neighbors, Japan, India, Taiwan and the Philippines have nothing but positive things to say. The aggressor Russia is doing nothing wrong, and all evidence to the contrary is fake → there is no point talking to you.

There were 11,737 civilian deaths during the initial invasion of Iraq in 2004?

Do you think the 600.000 soldiers and 13.000 civilians that have died so far in the war would agree with this sentiment? How is China a peacemaker while threatening their neighbors with war?

A military wannabe-dictator restricting Freedom of the press, rejecting democracy and weaving ties with Russia, awesome

Why?