Y’all are the dorks writing novels instead of touching grass and organizing people in person.

I think of Maos Cultural Revolution, or all the Korean civilians caught up in the Korean War murdered for being seen as “collaborators”

I’m not a fan of centralized state power, period. Any time there’s a lot of concentrated power there’s abuse of that power.

Your argument is “anarchism has yet to really happen therefore it can’t”. My argument is “authoritarian communism has been tried and failed and a whole lot of people suffered in the process”.

I don’t even want to argue, I find leftists who post long books of theory like what you just did to be completely insufferable. It’s so off putting to the general public.

Meanwhile, we have the Kurds practicing anarchism, we’ve got some anarcho syndicalism going on with the mondragon corp, they’re small examples but they’re good examples not full of controversy.

Anarchists have yet to murder millions, unlike communists who seem to need a state to become stateless

I don’t really wish to debate this. Marxism so far has involved centralized power. Centralized power is easy to manipulate and corrupt. Anarchism at its core is decentralized power. Not impossible to manipulate and corrupt but more difficult.

Most people want to be left alone with the fruits of their labor. Anarchism is more likely to accomplish this.

Marxism already proved itself corruptable.

Anarchist. I lean somewhere between anarcho communist and libertarian socialist. In the most basic sense, I’m suspicious of power because I believe power corrupts and no system of economics or government is immune to this.

Yeah, meanwhile the only actual tankies are the ones who cheerlead the USSR and PRC.

As an anti authoritarian, while I can see some redeeming qualities in those countries, overall I’m not a fan. Though I do love me some propaganda art from the time.

Don’t forget being called a tankie for daring to rightfully criticize the democrats for being the frauds they are.