No I think we’re aligned! I am not trying to say the “build literally everything” from scratch is a viable alternative. You could go all the way down the rabbit hole of building a compiler, your own programming language, a smelter to refine the metals you need to try to cobble together your own hardware. But of course that is not realistic, which was what I was trying to get at in my comment. Basically, given that it is not feasible to do everything by yourself, at some point it seems you have to decide to trust something to be a functional human and not devolve into solipsism. So the question I am asking is, what are your own evaluations of what is trustworthy? Do you trust coreboot more than AMI? Protectli versus Qotom? It seems to me that we have to make these sorts of evaluations, versus believing that because there is some risk to everything that those risks are all equal. Apologies if I am not being clear though.

Sorry, imprecise wording on my part, I meant build as in build/code from scratch, not build from source!

Thanks so much for sharing this! I think reading through it helps refocus the question I guess I should have asked, which is “Which vendors do people trust more in practice, recognizing that at some point recursive paranoia has to end unless one has the time and skill to try to build literally everything on their own?” And as a question of probabilities, it feels a bit more manageable to try to make a call and move on. I’m sort of thinking of this thread as a way for me to calibrate my current probability estimates with people who know more than I do and have likely thought about this question more than I have. But the reminder that there isn’t really going to be any certainty regardless of what I decide is well-taken.