data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/463b0/463b010eab7d8c6a1302e6abd158ee8f3fe6bdbb" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d920/8d9209cd6219f5e5f7e15f20a0c25b5ba3af713a" alt=""
So, this “advanced protection” mode prevents me from installing apps from non-PlayStore sources and developers could design their app in a way that requires this mode? So if someone is reliant on a single app requiring this mode then they would essentially have to get rid of all “unwanted” apps? Why do I think this “advanced protection” isn’t actually intended to protecting the user?
I really hope these checks can be circumvented, but even more that this will get them some EU lawsuits.
Yup. I hate to admit it, but the only reason why I’m currently running a custom firmware again is because my current banking app plays well with GrapheneOS. Otherwise I’d probably not bother. Being able to use a banking app is just too convenient (for me personally).