Hey, appreciate the review! You’re absolutely right - stylometry isnt bulletproof, but its practical threat lies in correlation rather than precision. Intelligence agencies dont need 100% certainty - just enough probability to justify further surveillance. And with modern AI driven linguistic analysis, even “imperfect” stylometry becomes a powerful profiling tool.
Good point on tor traffic obfuscation. Random background activity helps break traffic patterns, but it’s important not to tunnel everything through tor - that just makes correlation attacks easier. Using monero syncing, onion services, and intermittent activity as cover noise is a solid approach, but layering it with non-tor traffic is key.
I’m Curious are you designing your lesson plan for general opsec education, or is it for a more specific field?
Local ai models can help against basic stylometry, but they’re not a silver bullet. Advanced stylometry doesn’t just analyze wording - it looks at sentence structure, punctuation habits, even typing cadence. If you just run text through an AI rewriter without changing behavioral patterns, you’re still traceable.
AI can be a tool, but relying on it blindly just shifts your fingerprint rather than erasing it.