Economist need not be lesse faire or free market capitalist

Most of the ones in the media just focus on market efficiency though

I wanted electoral reform but I think going for it would have been a mess.

No two major parties agreed on what should replace FPTP.

If the liberals had used a majority to unilaterally rewrite our elections that sets a bad precedent (Not that precedent seems to matter much these days).

I like this guy’s videos

They’re blunt and pretty straight to the point, and I’m especially glad he’s calling out the inappropriate nature of that speech.

Much faster than I expected!

Performance already seems fine for me

Do you have access to a command terminal?

Deactivate gravity, then object clipping, reposition the couch, then enable clipping and finally set gravity back on.

You must do this in the correct order or else you and that couch are falling through the floor.

The conversation is usually good… But yeah this article isn’t.

So he can’t keep his mouth shut ABS he’d rather complain about factually wrong things than try and help the country?

Let’s be honest, nothing will make him decide to lift these.

All we can do is retaliate with prejudice and move closer to Europe. I’d go scorched earth.

The US isn’t our allies anymore.

Well we know remote work is as efficient, but also there’s no reason a person in Toronto or Yellowknife or Victoria shouldn’t be able to work remotely for the federal government.

We’ve all seen the medieval art, I know this is definitely how it was

Ontario’s governing Progressive Conservatives unofficially kicked off their re-election bid with a promise to spend $1.8-billion to ensure every resident of the province has a family doctor or nurse practitioner, a pledge crafted to shore up the party’s vulnerability on primary health care.

Why do they need an election to do the ring we’ve been complaining about for 5 years

I like her energy

My only critique of this video is this isn’t so he can own the media, he’s straight up telling his base he’s going to ban trans people in public.

That “I only know if two genders” remark means revoking non binary passports, not recognizing non binary drivers licenses, and banning them from change rooms and public washrooms. That’s what the US is doing right now, and he’s parroting the same line because he sees Trump just won and is getting everything he wants.

I don’t put much stock in EKOS personally, so I’m waiting for additional polls too.

This is a well written and good argument

I don’t know why it isn’t apparent to so many that Pollievre never supports anything, he only criticizes and blames.

I do like the idea of communities that help each other out, but that doesn’t magically happen. People need to be able to help themselves before they help others, and inequality hurts that.

Maybe if they said they’d fight for Canadians, but so far all they’ve done is said they won’t use our best bargaining chips in public because it hurts their friends in the oil lobby.

Why should any Canadian support them?

I just don’t know why that isn’t a total deal breaker to so many.

They’re not even asking for much (an X on their ID or updated gender, and a new name, and literally a pot to piss in). They’re not forcing themselves on anyone. They’re not privileged or oppressing anyone.

I didn’t buy a house because it was in a strata that could only use Rogers.

All because I hated being their customer so much.

Ford cares about things he can see

That’s his buddies, Toronto traffic, and the selection of alcohol at restaurants and the gas station.

That’s an asinine use of money.

We could have done that for free by waiting a little bit.

I only like single malt reactions, with age statements.