I hate Microsoft so much that I’d prefer them to bankrupt and have some other duopoly. I’m ok with it being Linux and macOS. But not Linux and Windows.
Ideally, though … Linux vs FreeBSD. Since you cannot install macOS on anything but an Apple computer. So, that’s a niche thing already. A Linux / FreeBSD duopoly feels very nice to have!
By complex X setup I meant something that isn’t available in Wayland. I haven’t noticed anything being changed when I migrated from X to Wayland. On some machines I don’t even have XWayland installed. Hence, I don’t understand the ‘Wayland bad, I continue using X’ drama. I imagine these people have some complex setups that Wayland doesn’t support.








I did similar task recently, but used my old MacBook Pro 2011 (15 inch, with a faulty GPU). I chose DietPi, which I can recommend as a start distro for a newcomer. I chose it since I have some experience with it from my Raspberry Pi and I plan to give the laptop to a friend, who isn’t familiar with Linux. (For him to run Immich.)
I have a similar MacBook Pro for myself, with Arch Linux installed (my old laptop with a few keys now broken). It’s on WiFi, not Ethernet, and where the signal isn’t very good. Yet, I’m mostly happy with the result.
So far, being somewhat experienced with Linux, I think I’d choose DietPi for most server setups. I really love it, a good work done by maintainers. I can recommend going with it for your first self-hosted adventures.