• SacredPony@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Omg, a Chinese made ai wont talk shit about embarrassing Chinese politics, who could’ve ever predicted such a thing

  • ddplf@szmer.info
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I love asking him “Was 1989 a good year for China?” with DeepThink enabled.

    You can see him thinking for a second before he goes “[…] Hmm, I need to keep in mind that…” and then you just see him crash abruptly

  • boredtortoise@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    It doesn’t want to answer topics that Lemmy’s most famous China-advocating accounts claim are no problem. Huh

    • SapphireSphinx@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      It doesn’t want to answer topics that Lemmy’s most famous China-advocating accounts claim are no problem. Huh

      So what? Every model is censored. Yes it would be better if all models where completely uncensored but in my use case, I don’t spend my day asking questions about Winnie Puuh.

      This is a fantastic model that that is open source, and even commercially available for free and it is seemingly even better than the proprietary US based ones.

      • Rolder@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        What exactly is censored on US models? I was able to ask ChatGPT about government unfriendly things like the Tuskegee syphilis experiments or the Kent state massacre and I got accurate information out of it.

        • SapphireSphinx@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I can’t remember exactly what I asked it about so I’m guessing right now. Maybe ask it how to best kill the US president or how to build a bomb to kill as many people as possible? Yes, I agree. Killing the US president is probably worse than talking bad about Xi but it’s censorship nonetheless.

          I think I got some (unfounded) refusals because of something with copyright, if I remember correctly.

      • guy@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        There’s a difference between censoring sexual content or how-to-make pipebombs versus politics and free speech mate

        • SapphireSphinx@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          There’s a difference between censoring sexual content or how-to-make pipebombs versus politics and free speech mate

          Absolutely. But now we are in a discussion about what kind of censorship is ok. That’s not the point. the point was: There are no uncensored SOTA models.

      • TheObviousSolution@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Take your whataboutistic absolutes somewhere else, there are uncensored models and the fact that there is potentially heavy censorship behind the major ones to serve political interests is not a good thing.

        • SapphireSphinx@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          there are uncensored models.

          Which SOTA models are uncensored? Honest question. I had ChatGPT refusing to answer multiple times. ChatGPT refuses to answers even harmless questions. I tried it just now with a local Llama model: It’s censored too. Sure, they censor different things but they are censored nonetheless.

          Edit:

          I haven’t downvoted you.