Is anyone actually surprised by this?

  • P4ulin_Kbana@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Unrelated but yesterday I saw a post where the person was mocking those concerned by the chinese getting their data, saying things like “why would they care” and some people sarcastically saying they wouldn’t understand the data because “it was in another language”. Were those people right or not?

  • Petter1@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    We are now at a time where US blocks China services in order to protect its companies

    Just like many US services are banned in China in Order to protect their companies

    So, I hope no surprise…

    ———

    Its or their for countries?

  • Jhex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 hours ago

    as opposed to OpenAI which also stores keystrokes and then sells them to anyone who’d pay?

    • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 hour ago

      When I read DeepSeek’s privacy policy, I was creeped out by the invasiveness of the keystrokes thing. Then I realised that ChatGPT is just as creepy, but less upfront about it, and DeepSeek’s relative transparencyn caused me to see them in a more favourable light

  • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 hours ago

    They should store the data in US servers like OpenAI does. Apparently then Mashable won’t write an article about it.

    The criticism thrown at DeepSeek in the past days is just as applicable to American AI models. But when that was brought up it in the past it was “making things political”.

    At least I can run DeepSeek locally.

  • JOMusic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 hours ago

    This article is what US propaganda looks like folks. Mashable should be ashamed.

    Literally all AI companies do this to run their services. Except you can actually download Deepseek and run it completely securely on your own devices. You know who doesn’t allow that security? OpenAI and the other US companies currently being screwed.

    • zeca@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 hours ago

      every google site has been doing this for years too. every comment we write in youtube and discard before posting, its being recorded. this isnt news at all.

  • ArchRecord@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 hours ago

    the company states that it may share user information to "comply with applicable law, legal process, or government requests.

    Literally every company’s privacy policy here in the US basically just says that too.

    Not only does DeepSeek collect “text or audio input, prompt, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other content that [the user] provide[s] to our model and Services,” but it also collects information from your device, including “device model, operating system, keystroke patterns or rhythms, IP address, and system language.”

    Breaking news, company with chatbot you send messages to uses and stores the messages you send, and also does what practically every other app does for demographic statistics gathering and optimizations.

    Companies with AI models like Google, Meta, and OpenAI collect similar troves of information, but their privacy policies do not mention collecting keystrokes. There’s also the added issue that DeepSeek sends your user data straight to Chinese servers.

    They didn’t use the word keystrokes, therefore they don’t collect them? Of course they collect keystrokes, how else would you type anything into these apps?

    In DeepSeek’s privacy policy, there’s no mention of the security of its servers. There’s nothing about whether data is encrypted, either stored or in transmission, and zero information about safeguards to prevent unauthorized access.

    This is the only thing that seems disturbing to me, compared to what we’d like to expect based on the context of what DeepSeek is. Of course, this was proven recently in practice to be terrible policy, so I assume they might shore up their defenses a bit.

    All the articles that talk about this as if it’s some big revelation just boil down to “company does exactly what every other big tech company does in America, except in China”

    • tux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Collecting keystrokes is very different from collecting text inputted into fields. Keystroke rhythms is even more alarming as that is often used to identify users despite them using privacy settings, or used to collect what’s typed via audio collection.

      Your argument that this is no different than other apps is complete crap. Don’t trust any app that collects that information

      • Ferk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        The argument stands, though.

        Yes, not ALL other apps do that, but the comment was specifically talking about companies like Google and Meta… they definitely do collect incomplete strings from forms, down to individual characters when they display search suggestions, for example. They might not mention “keystrokes” in the legal text, but I don’t see why they wouldn’t be able to extrapolate your typing pattern since they do have the timing information which should be enough data to, at some level, profile it.

  • Jentu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Idk DeepSeek probably just stores things in the history of my Terminal window.

  • uis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Did they become american company?

    Well, at least models are downloadable.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Get it all you can, nvidia’s already lobbying to make them a security risk, competition is bad for business.