fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · edit-22 days agonetsmander.xyzexternal-linkmessage-square159fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linknetsmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · edit-22 days agomessage-square159fedilink
minus-squareNSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 day agosupply and demand is a theory about price discovery. it has no bearing on this discussion.
minus-squarex00z@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 day agoYou’re claiming my choice has no impact, but it does because of supply and demand. It’s very small, but it’s still there.
minus-squareNSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 day agothis is just handwaiving. supply and demand isn’t a magic phrase that makes your actions have the desired effect.
minus-squarex00z@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 day agoThat’s why I’m sharing the solution: Don’t contribute to the problem. If we don’t eat fish there would be close to no nets in the oceans.
minus-squarex00z@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 day agoYeah because there’s too many people who are too stubborn to give it up.
minus-squareNSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 day agoregardless of the excuses you want to make for your plan’s ineffectiveness, I’m trying to find an effective solution
minus-squarex00z@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 day agoMaybe you can get people to stop eating fish, so fishermen lose their job of destroying the sea.
minus-squareNSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 day agothat doesn’t sound like a workable plan. good luck with it though.
minus-squareLileath@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 day agoIf no one ate fish anymore, would it still be profitable to fish in an industrial style?
minus-squareNSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 day agoI don’t think that’s likely to happen. do you have another method that might be effective?
supply and demand is a theory about price discovery. it has no bearing on this discussion.
You’re claiming my choice has no impact, but it does because of supply and demand. It’s very small, but it’s still there.
this is just handwaiving. supply and demand isn’t a magic phrase that makes your actions have the desired effect.
That’s why I’m sharing the solution:
Don’t contribute to the problem.
If we don’t eat fish there would be close to no nets in the oceans.
that hasn’t worked so far.
Yeah because there’s too many people who are too stubborn to give it up.
regardless of the excuses you want to make for your plan’s ineffectiveness, I’m trying to find an effective solution
Maybe you can get people to stop eating fish, so fishermen lose their job of destroying the sea.
that doesn’t sound like a workable plan. good luck with it though.
If no one ate fish anymore, would it still be profitable to fish in an industrial style?
I don’t think that’s likely to happen. do you have another method that might be effective?