This from the guy who needed ‘splitting the vote explained’
just because you insisted on linking your favorite think tank doesn’t mean anyone needed to see it.
This from the guy who needed ‘splitting the vote explained’
just because you insisted on linking your favorite think tank doesn’t mean anyone needed to see it.
if you don’t know about the most successful third party in America that never won an election, you should probably not be the one teaching about third parties
the fact you need to search indicates you may not be qualified to be having this discussion.
the prohibition party never won, but they got a constitutional amendment.
the point is building a movement and demonstrating power.
there’s not one Green Party member of Congress as of 2024.
this has nothing to do with what I said
no, they are earning votes the Democrats can’t.
this is just spam.
the answer is the green party does push leftist views.
like I said, I think she’s doing everything I can expect. it’s not nothing, as you seem to imply.
if you’ve ever been arrested, you will know that the judge tells you to stay out of the kind of situations that resulted in your arrest. she is being silenced by the state.
but go on and snark. I’m sure you are much more effective, since everyone is asking what you have been doing since the election
the question was what has she been up to. that’s enough, imo
it’s a pretty low-stakes business. i’m sure they don’t care even if they see the traffic. the IT is outsourced, so i’m sure it’s just a CYA contract.
oh, in that case, dealing with corrupt officials trying to silence her. it’s just another day for jill.
what has Jill Stein been up to
protesting the genocide in gaza. actually got arrested for it.
The GOP has been using the Green Party to split the Left vote for years.
how could that be effective, if the green party didn’t push leftist views?
stop. stop. you’re making too much sense!
If it’s ever successfully repealed, you’d become liable for anything posted to your forum
unless you refuse to moderate it. then you are only criminally liable in the circumstances that have been codified, which usually has a takedown grace period.
a vocal minority on our instance like them
i have some problems with them, but not defederation-worthy.
i use ssh dynamic proxy back to my home “server” (a mid 2010’s macbook running debian), and all IT sees is encrypted traffic to a bizarre domain.
correcting your assumptions is generosity, not petulance