• silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yes, there’s a history of lower-intensity fire, of the sort which doesn’t threaten structures at scale.

      • reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Right but if the low intensity ones are repressed that leads to higher intensity ones plus climate change exacerbates the situation making former low intensity ones higher intensity due to increased drying and erosion cycles. Makes the most sense not to allow development imo.

        • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Chaparral and grasslands (what that area has) regrow pretty quickly. This isn’t problem of fuel accumulating over decades as has happened in the Sierras. You’d need to be removing vegetation every year, which would also kill off the native plants.

          • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            The frequent burns are what’s killing the native plants. Burns aren’t supposed to happen this frequently, and invasives are crowding out the drought resistant natives.