• Walters, Fern@bookwyr.meBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      Further explaining the optics of politics?
      How much theory & history do you read?

      • isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        None of what you wrote addresses anything about what I wrote. I pointed out that historically we absolutely have had to care about optics and appealing to the mainstream. You just responded, “well, there’s tons of shitty stuff the mainstream likes.”

        Who gives a fuck? We’re talking about strategies to get rights and what’s worked historically. Bitching about the bad takes of the mainstream didn’t win gay rights. Appealing to the interests of the mainstream did.

        And “read theory” is thought-terminating cliche at this point.

        • Walters, Fern@bookwyr.meBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          25 days ago

          Rights that we gave ourselves, or pleaded to a mainstream? Why are we appealing to a mainstream that mainstreams our genocide?

          • isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            25 days ago

            You can’t give rights to yourself. You only have rights if society recognizes those rights. That’s why we appeal to the mainstream. The Civil Rights movement didn’t break the back of Jim Crow by saying, “we should only focus inward on celebrating black voices and culture. Why bother appealing to the white mainstream? They’re the ones that are mistreating us!”

            • Walters, Fern@bookwyr.meBanned from community
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              25 days ago

              Society right now, recognizes that rights are only for the rich, not you and I. Appealing to the rich is what you’re asking us to continue.
              In talking about back breaks, why do the rich continue to break ours?

              • isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                25 days ago

                And yet, if our ancestors had had your attitude, none of the civil rights victories of the last century would have happened. It’s self-defeating.

                Gay marriage was only won a little over a decade ago. That was not in any way a belief that only the rich deserve rights.

                Put away the Marxist crack pipe. I’m pretty leftist myself, but leftists often get way too myopically focused on just economic issues.

                • Walters, Fern@bookwyr.meBanned from community
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  25 days ago

                  My ancestors answered our genocide in the only language the mainstream speak.
                  Ida B. Wells on riffles
                  Stonewall riots
                  Stonewall violence
                  Marsha P Johnson and friend, Christopher Street Liberation Day, NYC, 1976 (Credit: Biscayne/Kim Peterson)
                  gay rights liberation front
                  Appealing to your oppression is why you’re oppressed.