This article goes more into how EAC for Linux is being altered. Basically EAC can run with ring 0 access on windows machines to prevent cheats, but on Linux it doesn’t have the same level of invasive access. This is better for user privacy, but also limits its ability to prevent cheating.

The upcoming EAC Linux v2 will fall into a middle ground between the two, and will require the kernel to be signed with a key Epic recognizes. The system will also have to have TPM 2.0 and secure boot enabled. I recommend reading the article for more details.

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is a good thing. Yes, it’s not perfect. Yes, Fortnite and Epic are not great. But it’s so exhausting when people say “you can’t game on Linux” because games like Fortnite don’t work on Linux. The argument I always make in response is that it’s like saying you can’t game on a Gameboy because it doesn’t have Fortnite.

    The main reason for a lot of people not switching to Linux is because they only play games like Fortnite (competitive multiplayer games with aggressive anti cheat) and those games don’t work on Linux. (Marvel Rivals being the big exception to the rule.) Fortnite supporting Linux in some form will bring more users to Linux. More users on Linux will mean more studios view it as profitable to support.

    So, yes, this is a good thing. Yes, I fully admit it’s not perfect, but it’s a huge step I think most of us can admit we never saw happening.

  • Railcar8095@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    A good move from a bad actor. I wonder if they will release a native version or use proton (with another name, because of course).

    This and the forced open sourcing of Photoshop is destroying windows moats.

  • realitaetsverlust@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Well well well, fortnite losing tons of players, epic firing thousands of devs … suddenly the people that are switching to linux getting more relevant huh timmy.

    You can go fuck yourself tho.

  • 11111one11111@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    All you have to do is say fuck almost all the reasons i switched to linux and BAM youll be playing a shitty free2play royal rumble shooter in no time!

    • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah Sweeny has been an outspoken hater of Linux his entire life. Now that its gaining marketshare, hes flip flopping. Fuck off Timmy boy

      • ElectroLisa@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        OG Unreal Tournament games had native Linux versions, even as late as 2016 when Epic was developing a (now cancelled) 4th UT title.

        But then Fortnite happened and Epic switched from supporting Linux to antagonising it as it’s Valve’s platform thus enemy’s platform (his reaction, probably).

  • steelplatedmech@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Is the OS remaining secure and private with the anticheat that is requiring tpm, secure boot, etc?

    Or like the Windows anticheat is it going to be able to access all the files on the PC?

    • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyzOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      My understanding is that there’s a systemd service that runs only when the game runs, and that uses ePBF to restrict read/write access to the game files while it’s running (to prevent tampering). The tpm/secure boot/recognized kernel part is to make sure the user doesn’t have a modified kernel that will lie to the anti-cheat.

      If everything works like they say, they shouldn’t have access to the non-game files and no direct kernel access. So privacy should be maintained, and theoretically no risk of a EAC bug or exploit causing a full system crash.

      Overall it sounds much better to me than windows anti-cheat, but that’s a pretty low bar.

      • offspec@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m curious how effective it will be, I don’t think there’s anything wrong with leveraging secure boot to verify the kernel is unmodified, but does this mean dkms won’t be supported?

      • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Agreed to your comment. Only problem i have with it is that i use mainline to get latest kernels, and that wont work (kernel is not signed). Other than that, sounds good tbh
        Still not gonna run epic stuff, but technically it sounds good

        • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyzOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          You can have multiple kennels installed, so you could normally boot with mainline, but if you wanted to play a EAC game you could reboot with an approved kernel.

          • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Oh i know i can. I always have latest mainline + latest supported incase i run into issues. I just dont want to reboot to play games. Might as well use windows for gaming then :)

  • SwooshBakery624 [they/them]@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I am not gonna play Fortnite or anything with an invasive anti-cheat, but more multiplayer games available for Linux means more adoption amongst casual players. So, at the end of the day it’s a net positive thing.

  • artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Epic doesn’t care about Linux gamers. This is an AI publicity stunt. The app does not work and probably never will.