• fishos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Try reading the whole thing and comprehending it as a complex thought with nuance. I’ll wait. Might take you awhile but I’ll wait.

    • Draces@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      On boy are you dense. I agreed if your theory that bots are to blame is correct you have a legitimate complaint I dispute that and you got really confused and angry saying I don’t understand instead of anything of substance. Do you know what projection is?

      • fishos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I never said bots were the problem. I said people caring more about popularity is the problem and that once you realize this it’s super easy to program bots to imitate people by up voting/down voting what you want. But yes, call me dense when you’ve misconstrued my argument from day one.

        Edit: didn’t look like my previous comment posted so I rewrote it. Considering how dense you are tho, maybe two versions will help you finally understand, so I’ll just leave it.

        • Draces@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I never said bots were the problem

          it’s super easy to program bots to imitate people

          Considering how dense you are tho

          Hmm…

      • fishos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Because I never said bots are to blame. People are and once you realize that, programming a bot to do what people can do is super easy.

        I get offended when people try to tell me I made an argument I never made. But thanks again buddy 👍