• bzz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    I guess memes are brain rot. This feels like a get off my lawn comment.

    Just because it’s a relatively new meme/saying that derives from streamer culture, doesn’t make it brain rot.

    • Chocobofangirl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      It’s also the most unbiased word for referring to a group in a gender neutral way I’ve seen lol most others have implications of status (gentlepersons, folks), are still technically gendered (guys, not to mention this implies relatively young people too), or overbroad (everybody is well, everybody. Chat implies you’re addressing your community or a small group since they’re the ones who would be talking to you).

      • MHLoppy@fedia.ioOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        Wait “folks” has a status implication? IS NO WORD SIMPLY UNPROBLEMATIC!? IS NOTHING SACRED FROM THIS LINGUISTIC HELL

        • HatchetHaro@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          the way i see it, “folks” can refer to a more traditional group of people, most likely rural, and you wouldn’t call nobles or people of other high status “folks”.

          but also i doubt people think it is problematic; it’s just a quirk of the English language that “chat” emerged basically out of nowhere with the closest analogue being “audience”.

          • WhatsTheHoldup@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            the way i see it, “folks” can refer to a more traditional group of people, most likely rural, and you wouldn’t call nobles or people of other high status “folks”.

            But you’d call nobles or high status people “chat”?