You decrease the value of your vote when you write in yourself every time. Do you really have to agree with 100% of what anyone says? I’d have to write myself in if that was true.
Our electoral system is trash, designed in a way that disproportionately favors groups willing to compromise and coalesce behind a single candidate. If we split the vote by voting our conscience while the “other side” consolidates behind a single candidate, we’re at a serious disadvantage. The core issue is how the public is ignorant, or worse, misinformed and confident (made easier by ignorance). This is a failure of our education system, a system that’s been declining for decades. Not a lot I can do, I was born into this.
As just one cog in the machine, my power is limited. If I see a close race between two candidates, with others trailing far behind, I’m compelled to compromise for what I believe is the better outcome. If you prioritize supporting a third party, or if you genuinely see both leading candidates as equally shit, then by all means, vote third party. We all have our priorities. However, I do resent being judged for making pragmatic compromises to cause some change, as mild as it may be.
You decrease the value of your vote when you write in yourself every time. Do you really have to agree with 100% of what anyone says? I’d have to write myself in if that was true.
No one is making the argument that you have to agree 100% with whatever politician/party you’re voting for.
And where on earth did you get the “write in yourself” thing from, that’s an even more ridiculous strawman.
You have failed to make any effort at explaining yourself so Idk why I should.
Believe it or not, but there are more than two parties that run candidates in US presidential elections.
This shouldn’t need to be explained to you.
Of course there are. And if you want your vote to be useless, you can vote for them.
They’ll win if people vote for them.
More of this low effort trash, gtfo
The truth hurts, huh?
Our electoral system is trash, designed in a way that disproportionately favors groups willing to compromise and coalesce behind a single candidate. If we split the vote by voting our conscience while the “other side” consolidates behind a single candidate, we’re at a serious disadvantage. The core issue is how the public is ignorant, or worse, misinformed and confident (made easier by ignorance). This is a failure of our education system, a system that’s been declining for decades. Not a lot I can do, I was born into this.
As just one cog in the machine, my power is limited. If I see a close race between two candidates, with others trailing far behind, I’m compelled to compromise for what I believe is the better outcome. If you prioritize supporting a third party, or if you genuinely see both leading candidates as equally shit, then by all means, vote third party. We all have our priorities. However, I do resent being judged for making pragmatic compromises to cause some change, as mild as it may be.