• Lexi Sneptaur@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    I still contend that the best file browser ever made is the macOS Finder. When someone makes something that good for Linux, I’ll be very happy

        • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Sidebar defaults are bad. There’s no home directory. How do you get to your home directory? Cmd+shift+H, but can you get there without that special shortcut? You can’t see the file system’s structure in Finder. The GUI doesn’t have a way to go “up” in the directory structure. I don’t think you can do it in the GUI alone.

          It won’t let you see stuff in like \tmp\ without a fight, too. I don’t know how to open stuff in places like that without cd’ing to the location in the terminal, and doing open . in the desired directory.

          The list view is the least bad, but it gets unwieldy if your directories are deeply nested. It’s also bad if you started in the middle of the tree and want to go up. Gallery and column view are really bad for anything non trivial.

          I often want to see the entire file path, and it really doesn’t want to cooperate. If I do find the file I’m looking for, and want the full path, it doesn’t want to give it. I don’t even know if there is a way to get it. Other than like cmd+clicking -> “new iterm2 tab here” -> pwd, which is not really that helpful of Finder.

          Contrast with windows’ default explorer. It’s not perfect and I think windows11 made it worse, but still. Open it up, there’s the “my pc”, click through to my user directory, music, some album, then i can click the top thing and get the path. I can also see the whole tree on the left.

          Whatever I was using in Mint was similar to windows’ Explorer. Had no complaints about it.

              • Lexi Sneptaur@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 days ago

                That would be a waste of my time. You’re not someone who needs to know how to use one, so what’s the point of telling you how to use one? You’re an intelligent human being, you can figure it out if and when you need to. Until then, whatever tech you’re using serves your needs so it’s no biggie.

          • Lexi Sneptaur@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            Well, Windows Explorer is terrible, Dolphin is better but still not really that great, Nautilus is stripped back and barebones, Thunar is ancient and barely competes with what Windows XP had, and vifm is unreasonable unless you exclusively work in terminals. Did I miss any that are even remotely popular?

            • Noxy@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              Dolphin seems great to me! What do you think Finder does better than Dolphin?

              • Lexi Sneptaur@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 days ago

                In fairness, Dolphin is definitely the best available on Linux. I think Finder strikes the perfect balance of simplicity and customization. It’s easy to figure out for a newbie and powerful enough for a developer. Dolphin’s learning curve is a bit steeper and in my view it has too many features on offer. This is a common problem with KDE software. It’s not a big deal because KDE stuff isn’t used on commercially-available products that need tech support, and anyone using Linux should be able to get by just fine with it, but I still think Finder is simply better software with a longer history and judicious use of new features

                • Noxy@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  KDE stuff isn’t used on commercially-available products that need tech support

                  I’m sure there are organizations using Plasma desktop with IT departments supporting it, but I definitely take your point that Apple has orders of magnitude more spending on UI/UX and software development

                  I’m largely curious about Finder these days since I used macOS almost exclusively from the G4 days right up until about the time they switched to ARM, so it’s been a few years. I’m curious if Apple has made any significant improvements to Finder in the past, say, four years?