Top Trump official Stephen Miller’s recent declaration that anyone who “preaches hate for America” will face deportation has ignited alarm online, with critics warning the statement disregards First Amendment protections.

Social media users and legal analysts raised immediate concerns, pointing out that expressing dissent or criticism of the government is protected under the First Amendment. Some worried the administration was veering into authoritarian territory.

The backlash has reignited broader debates over the limits of free speech, especially as civil liberties fall under scrutiny. While immigration enforcement remains a core theme of President Donald Trump’s platform, critics are increasingly questioning whether rhetoric like Miller’s is a precursor to more aggressive suppression of dissent.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      This timeline is way, way worse than the Bell Riots.

      First of all, Sanctuary Districts in US cities weren’t nearly as bad as supermax prisons in foreign countries.

      Second, at least they actually rioted. We’re still failing to do so, for some reason.

      • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        Can’t riot if only go outdoor twice a month to politely protest for part of a day .

        Can’t organize riots in social posts.

        Small groups of wealthy and influential citizens cannot ask, once more, if you will please riot.

        The USA cannot riot at all right now.

        It’s broken