I think all large organizations have several people who wish to do good, or at least dream of it. And those trying make good stories and provide hope.
Perhaps we are evolutionary designed to be drawn towards such people.
But it does squat all for 99.999% of the people caught up in these events
There was one Schindler and ten thousand monsters.
20 cents, take it or leave it
At least they are attracted to adults and not caterpillars
This may actually revive community support for some churches! Ice will not raid a church that has protesters blocking the door.
And what better way to thank the community than by offering food and activities?
Honestly, I know this is entirely subjective, but I never liked the vibes from proton especially in the last year. I’m going to use my animal instincts and just avoid them.
That said, I really need new email service so looking at options
It’s compatible with banning original links, and can break later
I read about him once: as bad as he was, as vilified as he will be through history centuries from now. He would make a great addition to the GOP senators or congressmen. Be one of most moral and principled of the lot
I think many people asked had heard about the issue for the first time and decided their opinions on the spot, usually without deeply thinking about it, often in the context of other questions, how they react to the polling, and what they heard in the last week, which varies.
I don’t see these polls as fixed positions.
Americans, especially liberals, have a phobia of calling out mass cheating by authority figures.
It’s like they need law and order so much, they are willing to ignore what is obvious. When a subject is taboo it’s not talked about , not dismissed, not encouraged
If exit polls don’t work in your state, and there is no physical ballot counting. And when tests on precinct numbers show strong suggestion of altering votes and the democrats always always underperform, it’s obviously a new phenomena, totally ok. Let’s just stop predicting elections early based on exit polls!
One such test post election for any state:
Arrange all precincts in the state by population and see if there a curve on the more people there are there, the more percentage of votes a particular candidate gets: if it’s only that candidate and it’s a smooth curve upwards that’s unnatural: California has no such correlation but some other states fail.
One should see a random looking up or down plot, or a straight line, or sorta straight. Not a growth curve. That’s because common tactic world wide to alter computer votes is to ads the extra votes based on precinct size.
Usually each state has easy to get data this way to one’s own source if amusement and the dozens of others who are thinking this might be interesting. Occasionally someone publishes graphs of it to thunderous uncaring.
It’s not the only problem but it’s the easiest way for non computer people to understand there is more to this
It’s really too bad all the four winged did not make through that asteroid
A favorite theory for anyone who totally does not understand the science behind it.
It’s not lab generated because it has no edited rna, you would think that gnome has been torn down and examined by hundreds of specialists labs in every single country.
If there was anything suspicious you would think someone would make a peer reviewed paper in a journal. And if that was censored there would be a freaking riot by scientists speaking dozens of languages in scores of nationalities of a multitude of political beliefs.
But I understand nobody who follows this theory will get any of that. So have fun with it
No I ain’t
The irony
Bad things happen to large groups of people and there are no heroes to rescue most.