YES thank you, finally somebody says it. I couldn’t muster the motivation to make this exact thought into a post yet even though the idea has been going through my head for a long time.
Of course, if every person uses their own house, you need lots of houses which “stimulates the economy”, i.e. it shifts wealth from the pockets of the workers into the pockets of the construction companies, up from where it goes partially to the owner’s pockets, partially to the wages. Yet with every iteration of the game the owners grab a bigger and bigger piece of the wealth, until it is all accumulated uphill. Consider:
YES thank you, finally somebody says it. I couldn’t muster the motivation to make this exact thought into a post yet even though the idea has been going through my head for a long time.
Of course, if every person uses their own house, you need lots of houses which “stimulates the economy”, i.e. it shifts wealth from the pockets of the workers into the pockets of the construction companies, up from where it goes partially to the owner’s pockets, partially to the wages. Yet with every iteration of the game the owners grab a bigger and bigger piece of the wealth, until it is all accumulated uphill. Consider:
It’s a bit thick on the wages and thin on shareholders but the concept is right