• LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    More reliable until the port fails. It’s just too small for daily use. They always break before anything else. Been that way since the days of the OG iPod and it’s maddening.

    I actually liked using lightning plug/USB-C adaptors. The flat but thick enough form factor heavily reduces the wear and tear IME.

    • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I’ve never had a 3.5 fail, are you sure it’s not just getting clogged with dirt or something?

    • LouSlash@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      More reliable until the port fails.

      And so can BT

      Tbh i didn’t have any problems with 3.5mm. It always worked for me (even when used in odd ways and angles).

      To be clear. I actually like BT and the ways it opens in terms of various accessories, but BT has its drawbacks while analog ports. That’s why i would prefer to have both BT and physical port (in case of BT failing)

      • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Part of it is use case. You don’t (typically) pull the iPod or any music player out over and over 100 times a day like a phone, so it often sat in your pocket for longer stretches. Big risk to cables because you’d progressively bend the end of the cord or gradually fuck up the port itself.

        It’s not about build quality, it’s that small/thin things are generally more liable to bend/warp/snap. If it was a quarter inch plug (absurd but bear with me) this would be a non-issue due to the sheer size.