• Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Okay, so Russia has been aggressive, but what about the time NATO attacked… uh… yeah.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        “What about that time NATO attacked genocidaires in the process of committing genocide on another country and stopped as soon as the genocidaires withdrew?”

        Yeah, I guess that was pretty horrific.

        • CarrotsHaveEars@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Are you saying NATO in order to stop a genocide, they killed the side who started the genocide? Well that sounds exactly like a genocide to me!

      • Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m not pretending that was a genius move from NATO or even that it was justified, but you didn’t have to read that far…

        The bombings continued until an agreement was reached that led to the withdrawal of the Yugoslav Army from Kosovo

        • CarrotsHaveEars@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          What about

          NATO launched its campaign without the UN’s approval, stating that it was inter alia a humanitarian intervention.

          and the fact that Yugoslavia had more than 1000 died and more than 5000 injured, while NATO’s loss was negligible?