• But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 hours ago

    To his kids and their charities? Reminder that Bill gates is every bit as exploitative and evil, he didn’t become a billionaire by paying fair wages. This is all PR to try and save his reputation as everyone turns on billionaires. Like buffet, he just shuffles his money to his kids and calls it charity

  • storm@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Can we quit running billionaire’s PR campaigns for them? These people are not our friends, and giving back a portion of what they stole (always in the most public way) doesn’t change that

  • TheDeadlySquid@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Still leaves him with just over $1 billion, enough for his great great grandchildren to live comfortably forever. Don’t be fooled, this is about tax breaks, not charity. Once you have over a billion in wealth, you’ve won the game of life. There’s nothing you can’t buy, there’s nothing you can do.

  • madcaesar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Don’t give it away.

    If you really want to help people, buy media, buy politicans and get REAL change that will actually last.

    You giving money to random charities does fuck all, except give you tax breaks.

    We need change in the political system so that we don’t need fucking charities for basic needs.

  • Zacryon@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    My tired brain read “99 cent” at first and I thought it was an article by The Onion.

  • excral@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 hours ago

    While it’s good that he’s willing to give away 99%, he’d still be a billionaire and one of the richest persons of the world afterwards. He’s so incomprehensibly rich that even 1% of his wealth is more than any single person should own.

  • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Sorry Bill but it’s too late and not enough. I still want to eat the rich and that includes you.

    Although I‘ll admit if all billionaires did this instead of - oh you know - investing in fascism and actively dismembering democracy globally I might feel different about this. But as things stand I am done with billionaires. We cannot coexist. Simple as that.

    • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Isn’t he literally the only billionaire who has been donating a lot over the years?

      But yes, fully agree. There’s no reason any person should be that rich. They’re cause and symptom of a fucked-up system

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Absolutely not. I think others give a bit less, but they’re just not public about it.

        Warren Buffet makes $5B annual donations to charities. He’s an investor, so if he gave it all out as a lump sum, he wouldn’t be able to make more to donate next year (and aside total received, many charities work better with consistent yearly funding)

      • Squizzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 hours ago

        How did he get to be a billionaire? By standing on the throats of others, he could not have created that wealth without harm.

  • whome@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Using all his money and influence to advocate taxing the super rich significantly would be helpful.

      • Squizzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Buffet has rescinded his giving in favour of leaving a trust to kids…who are senior citizens. If you cant stand on your own by then, you dont deserve to make it.

        • Katana314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 hours ago

          His son recently gave half a billion to Ukraine, out of pocket. I get the impression they At least have their minds on the right side of history.

          What would be great is if the trust is designed to be given to charities, rather than for his kin’s space flights. But they may do that anyway.

      • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I don’t believe there is a spectrum at all. If you keep going to get to that level of wealth you have a fucked up mind. Most people would be content and stop.

        Now I could see that if you make something and go from nothing to selling for a billion then maybe, but even then I’d want rid of most of that wealth as I don’t need that much.

        • Robbity@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Well if you just manage your money properly, it grows. I would argue it’s better to do that and give you money away rather than not manage your money properly. In the end, more money goes to good causes that way.

          If they “stopped” that would mean leaving their money in a bank account sleeping. The only entity benefiting from this would be the bank.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 hours ago

    How about by tomorrow you sadistic evil fuck?

    You may have spent billions to look pretty and nice to people but nobody should forget how he got those billions in the first place

  • polysexualstick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Bill Gates is 69. By 2045 he’s going to be 89. What’s he going to do with all that money at 89 anyways, after he kept it all his life.

  • FireAtWill@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Gates is an unusual man who deserves a lot of praise. Most billionaires only want to build monuments to themselves. Gates has picked off a lot of projects that have virtually no chance of being funded by anyone or anything else. That’s epic and legendary.

  • core_of_arden@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    In 20 years, while still sitting on a mountain of money… All rich people are evil. The sooner people realize this, the better.

    • smeenz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      I would hazard a guess that you live in a first world country, and therefore would be considered rich by those who do not. Therefore, by your own definition, you are evil.

      • stab48fjfifi@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I earn like 30% more than the median income here. Colonisation is the cause of wealth disparity and it’s disguisting but you can’t compare normal people with a dude who have more money than entire countries. It’s dishonest as fuck

        • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 hours ago

          You still earn more than me & have a lavish life compared to me who lives in a 3rd world

  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Though it’s better than hoarding, a billionaire can’t even give away their money without wielding a dangerous amount of influence on all of our lives.