If “migrants” have no right to appeal to the courts, citizens don’t really have the ability to either.
How do you know they are an illegal immigrant without a judge?
Are the immigrants the whit…I mean RIGHT skin color?? Cause this administration is filled to the brim with stable geniuses who are ✨ magically ✨ able to tell who is legal and who isn’t. We should tottaaaaalllly trust their judgement without question, they just want what’s best for the country, with absolutely NO ulterior motives.
/S
I doubt this administration is going to stop pushing it’s lawlessness unless there is push back with consequences. Throw Stephen Miller into a CIA black site and watch how fast this crazy shit stops.
Stephen Miller? The migrant? Yeah, sounds good. I heard he crossed the Darien Gap by eating five toddlers as rations.
Consider?
Pretty sure they’ve been doing that from the start.
detained illegal immigrants
FTFY NY Times.
It’s also a lie. They’re not “trying to”, they said that it is something that they might consider. It has been done 4 times before too.
This administration has repeatedly shown not to care about the status or criminal history of any non-US-born person. Also, they have revoked the status of legal migrants to be able to call them “illegal migrants” directly after, despite them doing everything correctly and being in America legally until the rug was pulled out from under them.
And aside from all of that, why are we okay with the government even thinking of doing this to anybody??? That should be a major red flag even as something they are considering. But based on their previous actions, it’s definitely something they want to do, which is even worse
EDIT: Just realized your username is “freedom advocate”. You of all people should be against this.
Randomly generated username.
Why are we ok with it? No one said they’re ok with it. I was simply commenting on the lies the NYT are spreading.
So far I’m seeing that what they wrote was far more accurate than what you did.
100% wrong but you do you.
No, this isn’t an agree to disagree situation. You are factually wrong, the NYT is correct. Stop spreading misinformation or fuck off.
The NYT is factually wrong.
They aren’t “trying to” do what the NYT says they are, the actual quote in the article even proves that. They said it’s something that they might consider. Those are not the same things.
If they were “trying to” they would have begun proceedings to do it. Have they? No.
Stop spreading misinformation
Oh the irony.
The article says they are considering it. I have no idea what your complaint even is. And I already debunked your lies that only undocumented people are being abducted. So you are full of shit and everyone can see that.
Oh yeah, none of the immigrants were here legally at all
/sThe illegal ones? No, they’re not - hence being illegal immigrants lol.
The point was that regime (“administration”) has cast their net far too wide; they’re not rounding up just illegal immigrants as you suggest, you wretched fuck. But of course you already know that and you’re just here to troll—or are you so fucking stupid to blindly believe that the regime has only acted against illegal immigrants?
Buh-bye! 👋
They are only rounding up illegal immigrants. Your entire point is based on a lie.
Completely and blatantly false. You are the one spreading lies here.
Here’s a small sampling but there are many more. I couldn’t find a comprehensive list and it might not exist.
You don’t know someone’s legal immigration status until you find out. The only people that have been deported or jailed are illegal immigrants.
Read the article dumbass. Some of these people are still imprisoned and the government knew they were legal when they grabbed them.
> FreedomAdvocate
> Dosen’t support freedom of movement.randomly generated username
supports legal immigration, dislikes criminals and law breakers
jumps at legal justification for their racism the second they get the chance under the incredibly flimsy guise of “law and order” just like every other Nazi
*Trying to suspend
The headline is not doing constitutional democracy and the rule of law any favors by making casual readers think they have that power, which (sorry to be all technical, NYT) they do not have.
(sorry to be all technical, NYT)
No reason to apologize. The NYT routinely do it on purpose, especially when it comes to cops and Israel.
If “migrants” have no right to appeal to the courts, citizens don’t really have the ability to either.
“Oh he’d never do that to real Americans…”
Meanwhile, the leopards are waiting.
The leopards yearn for the faces.
