• WizardOfFrobozz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Americans would rather chuck perfectly good food into a dumpster than entertain the possibility of summoning the collective fucking will to fix a VERY straightforward problem. The idea that they could just legislate some reasonable liability protections and make sure edible food gets to hungry people apparently requires a level of imagination and civic competence beyond anyone’s wildest dream. So much easier to blame “some asshole” for creating what is surely an insurmountable legal paradox. The food rots, needy people go hungry, and the US gets to pretend the problem is some unavoidable fact of life rather than admit they just couldn’t be arsed to try.

    • Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Most stabilized countries have laws in place for food and protections for donations.

      I’m guessing there’s rules behind this one but in the US:

      The Food Donation Improvement Act: This act expands those protections. It allows qualified businesses (like restaurants, supermarkets, and schools) to donate food directly to individuals in need rather than having to route it through a registered 501©(3) nonprofit intermediary. It also allows nonprofits to charge a nominal “Good Samaritan” fee just to cover the logistics and handling costs of distributing the food.

      I don’t know the specifics of that one though.

      • left_is_best@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Easier & cheaper to just throw it away, so most businesses probably don’t bother. We would need to mandate and/or subsidize this behavior if we wanted people to actually do it.

          • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Does that include food left on the vine so it can fertilize the soil or just the stuff left on because it couldn’t sell

          • left_is_best@feddit.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Sure, but they have stuff to throw away other than food, too, so they’re paying for it regardless. Some places in the US make property owners pay for waste disposal separately, but even then it could be a flat fee so the business wouldn’t gain anything by throwing less stuff away. Some places just include it in property taxes, in which case, again, the business wouldn’t gain anything.

              • left_is_best@feddit.online
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                2 days ago

                Collection is often on a schedule so it gets emptied regardless.

                It may very well be the case that most American businesses pay by the pound, ton, or bin. I don’t know. I do know that in some cases it’s a fixed cost, up to the size of a bin within a certain time period, anyway.

                • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  In one of my brother’s town, the residential pickup is scheduled weekly but if you use all of the bins they charge you more.

    • Arcadeep@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      No, actually, most Americans are not happy about it, but you probably don’t care about nuance and just want to throw a fit