• heartSagan5@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Well, pregnancy in general. It’s based on “continued growth.” It cannibalizes itself in any other conditions, well, in general.

  • fartographer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    These are the same people who claim that kids shouldn’t get sex ed in public school because they’re too young and innocent to understand sex or safe sex. That abstinence-only is the best lesson.

    • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      To them? It is. Because young girls aged 13-17 are “the most fertile” or some remarkably gross ass shit.

  • Z745812939054@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    of course it’s a problem, when you see women females as property whose function is to make sammiches and be perpetually pregnant with their head of household’s future manly maga men sons

  • Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    doesn’t provide free childcare

    complains about lack of teenage pregnancies

    Eat a fat dick fox promote free child care or stfu

    Edit oh and free delivery for kids. As well as free medical care for kids. If that’s too radical then eat a ghoneria soaked cock.

    • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Don’t tell them that some men can get pregnant. Their head might explo…

      Tell them some men can get pregnant.

  • JennyLaFae@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    People having kids too young contributes to both worker drones for the capitalist class and exploitable youth for the e-suite. Our current wave of transphobia was started with the intention of making trans people more exploitable.

  • AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Breaking news! The party for defending pedos is defending raping minors! Who could have seen that coming? More news at 10!

    • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      I wouldn’t even go as far to defend raping minors (they totally 100% do), but they’re also upset that young girls aren’t getting pregnant at all, even through consensual sex with a male partner of their age group. All those damn liberal types are educating grooming our kids into “safe sex” and giving them “autonomy over their own decisions”. More kids are growing up with more information about sex and that is resulting in a drop in youth pregnancies.

      And that is what is upsetting them.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Well yeah, but they also have the agency to prevent themselves from having kids they can’t afford, and that’s just flat-out unacceptable to conservatives.

    • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Yeah, but this isn’t about people having kids. It’s about kids having kids.

      Grown adults who can make conscious choices in life, tend to be more balanced in life decisions every day, are not the ones they care about having kids. Those adults have agency, and can make informed and consensual decisions to have children, and can weigh their current life situation, financial situations, etc.

      They want kids to have kids, so they are forced at a young age to drop out of school and get working to raise your kids. Oh, you wanted to grow up, experience life, and go to one of those liberal indoctrination buildings they call “post-secondary education”? Fuck you and flip my burger for $7 an hour, you have a child to feed.