• James R Kirk@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      I am just getting started on this journey but zigbee seems great and I like that it works fine even if the wifi goes down. I’m not sure what the drawbacks are or the benefits of Matter.

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        matter and thread are different things fyi…

        thread uses the same wireless communication as zigbee (zigbee has other stuff on top of it), so is a low power wireless protocol

        matter is the data format that devices use to communicate on top of an IP-based network like wifi or thread. it’s meant to standardise all these competing “works with google” “works with alexa” “homekit compatible”: if it works with matter, it should work with any coordinator that has matter compatibility (which all the big ones do these days)

        thread will work great if the wifi is down - same as zigbee!

        matter also (afaik) forces local devices: your coordinator (a homepod, alexa, etc) talks directly to the device without going through the internet. again, same as zigbee

        • James R Kirk@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          Thanks for the explainer, that last point is really great actually and I’m surprised that Amazon/Google etc are pushing for Matter if the data isn’t sent to the internet.

          • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 days ago

            well your coordinator gets to end whatever it likes wherever it likes but the devices themselves communicate over your internal network so everything should be much snappier