Pup Biru

i agree FOSS is the way to go, and that OpenAI has a lot to answer for… but FOSS is not the only way to interpret “open”

the “open” was never intended as open source - it was open access. the idea was that anyone should have access to build things using AI; that it shouldn’t be for only megacorps who had the pockets to train… which they have, and still are doing

they also originally intended that all their research and patents would be open, which i believe they’re still doing

figured i’d do this in a no comment since it’s been a bit since my last, but i just downloaded and ran the 70b model on my mac and it’s slower but running fine: 15s to first word, and about half as fast generating words after that but it’s running

this matches with what i’ve experienced with other models too: very large models still run; just much much slower

i’m not sure of things when it gets up to 168b model etc, because i haven’t tried but it seems that it just can’t load the whole model at once and there’s just a lot more loading and unloading which makes it much slower

it’s not asking for a 50% raise… it’s giving you the opportunity to retain talent and knowledge for the same rate as a competitor has offered

that’s true - i was running 7b and it seemed pretty much instant, so was assuming i could do much larger - turns out only 14b on a 64gb mac

that is an unprecedented misuse of power

you mean like that whole immunity thing?

i believe one of the big advancements with deepseek r1 is their method of adding the reasoning component is novel and very very efficient. i haven’t checked it out, but it could legitimately just be more efficient to run

it’s actually pretty easy to run locally as well. obviously not as easy as just downloading an app, but it’s gotten relatively straight-forward and the peace of mind is nice

check out ollama, and find an ollama UI

that’s not really how this works though… we don’t have the training data, so nobody else can recreate this from scratch exactly

*edit: adding this here because i just saw it elsewhere: https://huggingface.co/blog/open-r1

episodes shouldn’t be assumed to be exploring the same moral or philosophical points… it’s very difficult to explore complex logical arguments through innuendo whilst also maintaining a consistent grounding for all of them

and also, the decision is left up to the viewer: by presenting situations that both (perhaps) cross, and do not cross the line it allows us to form our own opinions, rather than the shows writers convince us of their idea of what’s right and wrong

people are fallible: the shows writers, and the characters. in some of that inconsistency, we can form our own ideas of what we believe

i think that the existence of the disease is more of a maguffin than the point that the solution was achieved without section 31… the “problem” could have been any number of unrelated things (eg some spacial anomaly threatening the founders for some reason, etc) and the fact that it’s s31 is more an interesting plot device to create other narratives around, rather than degrading the ultimate point

counter point: there are hundreds of articles and probably hundreds of thousands of comments about gemini etc and their US political censorship too

i think in this case it’s a reasonably unbiased comment

news.com.au is the fox news of australia fyi

other sources like 2GB that got mentioned are equally (perhaps more) trash. 2GB for example hosts our local version of alex jones

if the experiment succeeded and they’re both selfless and humble that number should be 0

considering their apparent inability to learn, if you manage to teach 1 humility you’d best not waste it: feed the whole billionaire to the next, and then repeat the process until all billionaires in the world are selfless and humble

must be nice to find it funny rather than be scared for your friends lives like the LGBT community is

wow equating Nazis with communists - now there’s a false equivalence

I think we would do well to turn down the temperature a bit and try to understand each other rather than throw around these big insulting words that clearly we don’t really understand.

what a great way to turn down the temperature! being condescending… good work bud

perhaps take a look at the comment votes once in a while and do some self-reflection on your communication style, if not the correctness of your statements and either say: sorry, i’m clearly miscommunicating, or sorry you’re right

yall is good; especially when trying to be respectful on non-gendered phrasing

in a healthy kink relationship, the submissive is the one in control: what they say goes; the dom merely makes suggestions in a manner that seems to outsiders as if the sub doesn’t have the control (and indeed the headspace of both participants leans toward that too). if the sub says no, it does not happen

this isn’t a hierarchy; this is a complex relationship that can’t be defined as narrowly

furthering the explanation: tankie as a term came about from people who agreed with the USSRs use of tanks to quash revolt in hungary

if someone wears a shirt specifically designed to draw attention to their larger than average breasts, perhaps people should not be surprised when people… yknow… pay attention to said breasts?

with that being said, the actual content of the comments, pretty gross and degrading… but the fact that the comments are about breasts should not be surprising in the slightest