jerryh100@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 4 days agoThis is how the censorship works in DeepSeeklemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkThis is how the censorship works in DeepSeeklemmy.worldjerryh100@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square37fedilink
minus-squarespujb@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 days agoAI generated content is against the community rules see the sidebar :)
minus-squareA_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.worldshieldMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 days agoPrompts intended to expose authoritarian censorship are okay in my book
minus-squareSreudianFlip@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoI’m here for the performative human part of the testing. Exposing AI is human generated content.
minus-squareBB84@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 days agoI just really hope the 2023 “I asked ChatGPT <abc> and it said <xyz>!!!” posts don’t make a comeback. They are low-effort and meaningless.
minus-squareSatanClaus@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 days agoTrue. This specific model is relevant culturally right now though. It’s a rock in a hard place sometimes lol
minus-squarespujb@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 days agojust giving context to their claim. in the end it’s up to mods how they want to handle this, i could see it going either way.
AI generated content is against the community rules see the sidebar :)
Prompts intended to expose authoritarian censorship are okay in my book
I’m here for the performative human part of the testing. Exposing AI is human generated content.
I just really hope the 2023 “I asked ChatGPT <abc> and it said <xyz>!!!” posts don’t make a comeback. They are low-effort and meaningless.
True. This specific model is relevant culturally right now though. It’s a rock in a hard place sometimes lol
just giving context to their claim. in the end it’s up to mods how they want to handle this, i could see it going either way.