• kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    I personally dont get why they went with Nvidia again, they make cheap mobile processors and I doubt this one will be any different. Imo they should have gone with a low end AMD APU based on Ryzen 9000.

  • TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Not too surprising they didn’t change much. The switch was a huge hit so fixing things like the joycons, adding a stand, etc. was the way to go.

    My guess (hope) is that the only new titles exclusive to the switch 2 are ones that the original switch wouldn’t have the processor strength to play and that they won’t arbitrarily wall them but we’ll see.

    • PirateKingLuffy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      Unfortunately games have been struggling on the Switch’s hardware for a couple years. There were a few parts of the newest Pokémon game that felt like a slideshow presentation.

      • ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        Pokémon

        Is that still scarlet and violet? Because if so, I don’t think that was a problem with the switch.

    • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      The Nintendo switch came out in early 2017, and it really wasn’t all that powerful then. It’s 8 years later, and it really shows. I don’t think they should make new games for the Switch. If developers have to consider the original Switch, the games will suffer. It had a good run, and a good library. But it’s time for the original switch to retire.

  • Willie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    It’s basically the same. And it makes sense, it seems that’s what people want. But also, can Nintendo ever go back to the old ways? If ever they make something that isn’t a Switch, they’d have to develop two pieces of hardware, since they’re likely going to want both a home console and a handheld device. I think things might be like this forever.

      • jacksilver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        I feel like the nes->snes, gb->gbc->GBA, ds->3ds, and wii->WiiU were all pretty similar advancements.

        In all of those except nes->snes you had backwards compatability, and the wii->WiiU had hardware backwards compatibility (which the switch 2 doesn’t, at least for controllers).

        • Exec@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          Most of those “sequels” had something new and innovative and not just a spec bump. The Switch 2 does not really have anything so far