• Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Not really. They are more “fuck the guy on the left, he didn’t make implement my favorite policy the last time, and he said this one thing this one time, I will never vote for him”.

      Crickets about the guy on the right.

      • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        I’ve literally argued with people saying it’s better not to vote and we should let conservatives win so people will get mad enough to revolt. Eventually.

        • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          I think it’s a level of naive optimism to think society will collapse and we’ll make something better, other than the harsh reality that this will continue plodding on. Real change is slow, and unglamorous.

          It’s like the people who believe and really want the rapture to happen, so they don’t have to cope with their everyday life.

          “Don’t worry, The Revolution will come any day now, no one knows when, and it’ll make things All Better.”

        • dukeofdummies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          ugh, I’ve had some success by arguing you should at least deface a ballot. Why assume they’ll know you’re mad and not lazy. If 10% of people wrote in “fuck all y’all” you might actually get people trying to win over their vote.

          “You showed up for the protests didn’t you? You didn’t just assume they got the message did you?”

          But man it’s like talking to a wall

          • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 days ago

            Robots that scan ballots don’t give a shit about your scribbles and will just not count the vote.

            Then you’re back to accelerationist nonsense

        • NotAnOtter@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          Accelerationism is rational if you assume the country is doomed. But I don’t think that assumption is rational.