blackn1ght@feddit.uk to United Kingdom@feddit.ukEnglish · 3 months agoRow as Starmer suggests landlords and shareholders are not ‘working people’www.telegraph.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkRow as Starmer suggests landlords and shareholders are not ‘working people’www.telegraph.co.ukblackn1ght@feddit.uk to United Kingdom@feddit.ukEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square10fedilink
minus-squareynazuma@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months agoThat is correct. They might work, but in context they are not “working people” Here “working people” is synonymous with “working class”. Thus, not landlords and shareholders obviously
minus-squaresunbeam60@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months agoI’m curious about your definition of shareholder; what if I owe £80 worth of fractional shares in an app-based investment service? Does that make me a shareholder?
minus-squarecook_pass_babtridge@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months agoIt certainly doesn’t make you a worker.
That is correct. They might work, but in context they are not “working people”
Here “working people” is synonymous with “working class”. Thus, not landlords and shareholders obviously
I’m curious about your definition of shareholder; what if I owe £80 worth of fractional shares in an app-based investment service? Does that make me a shareholder?
It certainly doesn’t make you a worker.