Got one not from a channel that wholesale publishes sponsored work?
Edison was a monster by every contemporary and modern account. I don’t know who paid him to narrate nonsense, but let’s not rehabilitate one of the worst humans on the planet.
I love it when you get millionaire (who would likely be billionaire) bootlickers in comments like this because you can almost always go back and check their replies. Low and behold, within the first few posts you immediatey get MRA shite.
It’s not exactly proof of character but it’s pretty easy to verify that Edison’s patent of DC Electricity was NOT novel or new as a concept but did allow him to create a monopoly and massively enrich himself while also increasing costs on the average person of his time.
This is lended to by the fact that in children’s books and schools in the USA Edison was portrayed as some magical fictional character who tied a key to a kite to invent electricity. Clearly there is a campaign made to make him look like the hero he isn’t.
But it doesn’t stop there, Edison had many patents that almost all built on the works of others going back decades, although I do think that he did more work than he stole on audio recording and transmitting, but he also patented the Telegraph like a hundred times even though the Cook and Wheatstone Electric Telegraph existed over 50 years earlier: a time before Edison was even born.
He was an OK inventor but he was a cutthroat businessman.
That “article” is like 300 words long, contains almost no information whatsoever, and every bit of info it does contain is also fully spelled out in the video I linked - that Edison wasn’t a single-minded visionary, but rather a ridiculously hard worker who worked collectively with his employees to create inventions scientifically.
The video also goes into detail about how he crafted a public persona to make sure his shop continued to have access to funding to keep up his inventing. I’m not quite sure how that’s supposed to be the nail in the coffin for his reputation though, since it was practically required for him to stay in business.
Nothing in that article impugns Edison’s name whatsoever (if anything, it fully supports the picture of Edison put forward by the video I linked), so, combined with your posting history, I think we’re done here.
Got one not from a channel that wholesale publishes sponsored work?
Edison was a monster by every contemporary and modern account. I don’t know who paid him to narrate nonsense, but let’s not rehabilitate one of the worst humans on the planet.
I love it when you get millionaire (who would likely be billionaire) bootlickers in comments like this because you can almost always go back and check their replies. Low and behold, within the first few posts you immediatey get MRA shite.
No opinion on Edison at all but what’s your problem with the whistler verse? They’ve been very good in my experience.
Should be really easy for you to produce some of this evidence that he was a monster then.
It’s not exactly proof of character but it’s pretty easy to verify that Edison’s patent of DC Electricity was NOT novel or new as a concept but did allow him to create a monopoly and massively enrich himself while also increasing costs on the average person of his time.
This is lended to by the fact that in children’s books and schools in the USA Edison was portrayed as some magical fictional character who tied a key to a kite to invent electricity. Clearly there is a campaign made to make him look like the hero he isn’t.
But it doesn’t stop there, Edison had many patents that almost all built on the works of others going back decades, although I do think that he did more work than he stole on audio recording and transmitting, but he also patented the Telegraph like a hundred times even though the Cook and Wheatstone Electric Telegraph existed over 50 years earlier: a time before Edison was even born.
He was an OK inventor but he was a cutthroat businessman.
Pedant moment. Benjamin Franklin was the key and kite guy. Edison was the lightbulb guy.
Sorry yeh I had those confused.
Here’s an introduction to Thomas Edison, https://theconversation.com/thomas-edison-visionary-genius-or-fraud-99229
It has actual sources, and isn’t a 4.5 hour sponsored video from whatever estate is trying to do PR for the name Edison.
That “article” is like 300 words long, contains almost no information whatsoever, and every bit of info it does contain is also fully spelled out in the video I linked - that Edison wasn’t a single-minded visionary, but rather a ridiculously hard worker who worked collectively with his employees to create inventions scientifically.
The video also goes into detail about how he crafted a public persona to make sure his shop continued to have access to funding to keep up his inventing. I’m not quite sure how that’s supposed to be the nail in the coffin for his reputation though, since it was practically required for him to stay in business.
Nothing in that article impugns Edison’s name whatsoever (if anything, it fully supports the picture of Edison put forward by the video I linked), so, combined with your posting history, I think we’re done here.
Look at his comment history 🤣