What’s the end game here? Another second closer to midnight?

  • CapriciousDay@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    I think Hanlon’s razor is a false dichotomy here. Neither stupidity nor malice are required to explain self-interest, which is the far more likely explanation given the people involved and their actions up to this point.

    • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Neither stupidity nor malice are required to explain self-interest

      Yeah but see that’s what does not compute: in what scenario does any oligarch benefit from increasing the country’s nuclear risk? There’s a thousand and one ways to make a lot more money a lot more safely, quickly and quietly.

      That’s why I’m of the opinion that Trumsk don’t friggin’ know what they’re doing.

      • CapriciousDay@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Without knowing the finer details, my assumption would be that it’s some kind of risk/reward tradeoff.

        Ok the nuclear risk is higher, but causing chaos in nuclear security could create opportunities like giving Trump or Musk more direct access to the nukes or removing people who might have prevented them from using them, thereby granting them more personal leverage. This would be in keeping with the Project 2025 aligned executive orders and such.

        There might even be commercial opportunities for Musk: “oh well the state management of nuclear security was super inefficient, ApocalypseX will do it”

        Remember disaster capitalism is a thing.