fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science@mander.xyzEnglish · 7 days agoDust from Car Brakes More Harmful than Exhaust, Study Findse360.yale.eduexternal-linkmessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkDust from Car Brakes More Harmful than Exhaust, Study Findse360.yale.edufossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science@mander.xyzEnglish · 7 days agomessage-square8fedilink
minus-squareduhhhh9@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·7 days agoespecially what? the regenerative breaking reduces brake pad wear greatly, and doesn’t shred/spit out the same material
minus-squareHirom@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-27 days agoEVs have very little exhaust coming out of their tailpipe. Which is one of the reasons why those are better than fossil powered charriots. So tires being a larger source of pollution than exhaust, in relative terms, is especially true for EVs. You make a good point, regenerative braking is probably reducing pollution in absolute terms.
minus-squareLaser@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up0·7 days agoWhat would be coming out of an EV’s tailpipe? Used electrons?
minus-squareTheSchatz@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·7 days agoI could be wrong, but I read that as a joke about EVs not having any exhaust.
especially what? the regenerative breaking reduces brake pad wear greatly, and doesn’t shred/spit out the same material
EVs have very little exhaust coming out of their tailpipe. Which is one of the reasons why those are better than fossil powered charriots.
So tires being a larger source of pollution than exhaust, in relative terms, is especially true for EVs.
You make a good point, regenerative braking is probably reducing pollution in absolute terms.
What would be coming out of an EV’s tailpipe? Used electrons?
I could be wrong, but I read that as a joke about EVs not having any exhaust.